TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of contrast and size on orientation discrimination
AU - Mareschal, Isabelle
AU - Shapley, Robert M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by National Eye Institute grant R01EY 01472 to Robert Shapley. We would like to thank Samuel Solomon, Andrew J. Henrie, Kukjin Kang, Peter Bex and Steven Dakin for helpful comments.
PY - 2004/1
Y1 - 2004/1
N2 - Motivated by the recent physiological finding that a neuron's receptive field can increase in size by a factor of 2-4-fold at low contrast [Nat. Neurosci. 2 (1999) 733, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 12073], we sought to examine whether a psychophysical task might reflect the contrast dependent changes in the size/structure of a receptive field. We postulate that since spatial summation is not contrast invariant, a task that relies on the spatial structure of a receptive field, such as orientation discrimination, should also be affected by changes in contrast. Previously, orientation discrimination thresholds have been reported to be roughly independent of the contrast of a stimulus for most of the visible range of contrasts [i.e. J. Neurophysiol. 57 (1987) 773, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 6 (1989) 713, Vis. Res. 30 (1990) 449, Vis. Res. 39 (1999) 1631]. Here, we found large improvements in orientation discrimination with contrast that were dependent on stimulus area. Furthermore, the apparent constancy of orientation discrimination for large area stimuli is possibly a result of a floor effect on the threshold. Therefore we conclude that there is not strong evidence for contrast invariant orientation discrimination. We interpret these results in the context of recent neurophysiological results about the expansion of cortical cells' receptive fields at low contrast.
AB - Motivated by the recent physiological finding that a neuron's receptive field can increase in size by a factor of 2-4-fold at low contrast [Nat. Neurosci. 2 (1999) 733, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 12073], we sought to examine whether a psychophysical task might reflect the contrast dependent changes in the size/structure of a receptive field. We postulate that since spatial summation is not contrast invariant, a task that relies on the spatial structure of a receptive field, such as orientation discrimination, should also be affected by changes in contrast. Previously, orientation discrimination thresholds have been reported to be roughly independent of the contrast of a stimulus for most of the visible range of contrasts [i.e. J. Neurophysiol. 57 (1987) 773, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 6 (1989) 713, Vis. Res. 30 (1990) 449, Vis. Res. 39 (1999) 1631]. Here, we found large improvements in orientation discrimination with contrast that were dependent on stimulus area. Furthermore, the apparent constancy of orientation discrimination for large area stimuli is possibly a result of a floor effect on the threshold. Therefore we conclude that there is not strong evidence for contrast invariant orientation discrimination. We interpret these results in the context of recent neurophysiological results about the expansion of cortical cells' receptive fields at low contrast.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242352557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242352557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2003.07.009
DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2003.07.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 14599571
AN - SCOPUS:0242352557
SN - 0042-6989
VL - 44
SP - 57
EP - 67
JO - Vision research
JF - Vision research
IS - 1
ER -