Embedding mindsets in context: Theoretical considerations and opportunities for studying fixed-growth lay theories in the workplace

Aneeta Rattan, Ezgi Ozgumus

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The goal of the current manuscript is to embed the theory of mindsets about malleability in workplace contexts. We first define fixed-growth mindsets and the methods that have to date been used to study them. We then briefly review the domains in which mindsets have been documented to shape outcomes meaningfully, linking each to exciting research questions that we hope will soon be studied in workplace contexts. We also highlight some of the fascinating, new questions scholars can study by considering how mindsets might shape outcomes across a diversity of workplaces (e.g., the workforce of low wage and vulnerable populations). We further propose that studying mindsets in workplace contexts can develop mindset theory. We first ask whether workplace contexts provide opportunities to test for moderation on mindset expression. Second, we see opportunity for studying moderation of mindset processes – evaluating whether the psychological processes through which mindsets shape outcomes may differ based on contextual factors that vary across workplaces. We argue that investigating these possibilities will advance both the theory of mindsets about malleability and the study of human flourishing in the workplace. We invite scholars to join us in this endeavour.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article number100127
    JournalResearch in Organizational Behavior
    Volume39
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 2019

    Keywords

    • Fixed-growth
    • Lay theories
    • Mindsets
    • Self-theories
    • Workplace

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology
    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Embedding mindsets in context: Theoretical considerations and opportunities for studying fixed-growth lay theories in the workplace'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this