Emotional and persuasive perception of fonts

Samuel Juni, Julie S. Gross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the latent affective and persuasive meaning attributed to text when appearing in two commonly used fonts. Two satirical readings were selected from the New York Times. These readings (one addressing government issues, the other education policy) were each printed in Times New Roman and Arial fonts of the same size and presented in randomized order to 102 university students, who ranked the readings on a number of adjective descriptors. Analysis showed that satirical readings in Times New Roman were perceived as more funny and angry than those in Arial, the combination of emotional perception which is congruent with the definition of satire. This apparent interaction of font type with emotional qualities of text has implications for marketing, advertising, and the persuasive literature.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages35-42
Number of pages8
JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2008

Fingerprint

Reading
Marketing
Students
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Emotional and persuasive perception of fonts. / Juni, Samuel; Gross, Julie S.

In: Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 106, No. 1, 02.2008, p. 35-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Juni, Samuel ; Gross, Julie S. / Emotional and persuasive perception of fonts. In: Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2008 ; Vol. 106, No. 1. pp. 35-42.
@article{78aec22eb6294dd99da6a12c72c2c0de,
title = "Emotional and persuasive perception of fonts",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to explore the latent affective and persuasive meaning attributed to text when appearing in two commonly used fonts. Two satirical readings were selected from the New York Times. These readings (one addressing government issues, the other education policy) were each printed in Times New Roman and Arial fonts of the same size and presented in randomized order to 102 university students, who ranked the readings on a number of adjective descriptors. Analysis showed that satirical readings in Times New Roman were perceived as more funny and angry than those in Arial, the combination of emotional perception which is congruent with the definition of satire. This apparent interaction of font type with emotional qualities of text has implications for marketing, advertising, and the persuasive literature.",
author = "Samuel Juni and Gross, {Julie S.}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.2466/PMS.106.1.35-42",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "35--42",
journal = "Perceptual and Motor Skills",
issn = "0031-5125",
publisher = "Ammons Scientific Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emotional and persuasive perception of fonts

AU - Juni, Samuel

AU - Gross, Julie S.

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - The aim of this study was to explore the latent affective and persuasive meaning attributed to text when appearing in two commonly used fonts. Two satirical readings were selected from the New York Times. These readings (one addressing government issues, the other education policy) were each printed in Times New Roman and Arial fonts of the same size and presented in randomized order to 102 university students, who ranked the readings on a number of adjective descriptors. Analysis showed that satirical readings in Times New Roman were perceived as more funny and angry than those in Arial, the combination of emotional perception which is congruent with the definition of satire. This apparent interaction of font type with emotional qualities of text has implications for marketing, advertising, and the persuasive literature.

AB - The aim of this study was to explore the latent affective and persuasive meaning attributed to text when appearing in two commonly used fonts. Two satirical readings were selected from the New York Times. These readings (one addressing government issues, the other education policy) were each printed in Times New Roman and Arial fonts of the same size and presented in randomized order to 102 university students, who ranked the readings on a number of adjective descriptors. Analysis showed that satirical readings in Times New Roman were perceived as more funny and angry than those in Arial, the combination of emotional perception which is congruent with the definition of satire. This apparent interaction of font type with emotional qualities of text has implications for marketing, advertising, and the persuasive literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41849109470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41849109470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2466/PMS.106.1.35-42

DO - 10.2466/PMS.106.1.35-42

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 35

EP - 42

JO - Perceptual and Motor Skills

T2 - Perceptual and Motor Skills

JF - Perceptual and Motor Skills

SN - 0031-5125

IS - 1

ER -