TY - JOUR
T1 - Enacted abortion stigma in the United States
AU - Cowan, Sarah K.
N1 - Funding Information:
I received helpful comments from Abigail Aiken, Margaret Frye, Amanda Geller and Amal Harrati. Two anonymous reviewers gave exceptionally valuable comments on three prior versions of this article. Data collection was supported by the National Science Foundation's Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant Award Number 1103078 and the Ford Foundation's Face Value Fellowship. At UC Berkeley, data collection was supported by the Department of Demography, the Mike Synar Graduate Research Fellowship at the Institute for Governmental Studies and the Institute of Business and Economics Research. During data collection, I received support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and T32-HD007275 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development awarded to the University of California at Berkeley. The Robert Wood Johnson Health and Society Scholars program provided support during some of the analyses. The article's contents are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official view of any of the funders.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - Rationale Abortion is a common medical procedure at the center of political debate. Yet, abortion stigma at the individual level is under-researched; the nascent research on abortion stigma has not yet documented enacted (experienced) stigma instead capturing anticipated or internalized stigma. Objective This study documents how women and men who disclosed abortions perceived others’ reactions and determinants of those perceptions. Method The study uses the American Miscarriage and Abortion Communication Survey, a survey representative of American-resident adults. Data from the sub-sample who had personal experience with abortion were analyzed (total sample, N = 1640; abortion disclosure sub-sample, n = 179). The survey captured each disclosure of the most recent abortion. Respondents had eight possible choices for articulating how the listener reacted. Cluster analyses grouped these reactions. Multinomial logistic regression identified predictors of the perceived reactions. Ordinal logistic regression revealed which disclosers perceived exclusively negative reactions, exclusively positive reactions, and a mix of negative and positive reactions. Results Each disclosure fell into one of three clusters: negative reaction, supportive reaction or sympathetic reaction. The majority of abortion disclosures received largely positive reactions (32.6% were characterized as supportive and 40.6% were characterized as sympathetic). A substantial minority of disclosures received a negative reaction (26.8%). The perceived valence of the reaction is predicted, in part, by to whom the disclosure was made and why. Across all their disclosures, most people disclosing an abortion history perceived only positive reactions (58.3%). A substantial minority of people perceived either exclusively negative reactions (7.6%) or a mix of negative and positive reactions (34.1%). Ordinal logistic regression (with people as the unit of analysis) showed perceived reactions are predicted by the number of disclosures made and the revealer's race and income. Conclusion Whereas most people disclosing an abortion received support or sympathy, a substantial minority received stigmatizing reactions, which could plausibly have a negative impact on health.
AB - Rationale Abortion is a common medical procedure at the center of political debate. Yet, abortion stigma at the individual level is under-researched; the nascent research on abortion stigma has not yet documented enacted (experienced) stigma instead capturing anticipated or internalized stigma. Objective This study documents how women and men who disclosed abortions perceived others’ reactions and determinants of those perceptions. Method The study uses the American Miscarriage and Abortion Communication Survey, a survey representative of American-resident adults. Data from the sub-sample who had personal experience with abortion were analyzed (total sample, N = 1640; abortion disclosure sub-sample, n = 179). The survey captured each disclosure of the most recent abortion. Respondents had eight possible choices for articulating how the listener reacted. Cluster analyses grouped these reactions. Multinomial logistic regression identified predictors of the perceived reactions. Ordinal logistic regression revealed which disclosers perceived exclusively negative reactions, exclusively positive reactions, and a mix of negative and positive reactions. Results Each disclosure fell into one of three clusters: negative reaction, supportive reaction or sympathetic reaction. The majority of abortion disclosures received largely positive reactions (32.6% were characterized as supportive and 40.6% were characterized as sympathetic). A substantial minority of disclosures received a negative reaction (26.8%). The perceived valence of the reaction is predicted, in part, by to whom the disclosure was made and why. Across all their disclosures, most people disclosing an abortion history perceived only positive reactions (58.3%). A substantial minority of people perceived either exclusively negative reactions (7.6%) or a mix of negative and positive reactions (34.1%). Ordinal logistic regression (with people as the unit of analysis) showed perceived reactions are predicted by the number of disclosures made and the revealer's race and income. Conclusion Whereas most people disclosing an abortion received support or sympathy, a substantial minority received stigmatizing reactions, which could plausibly have a negative impact on health.
KW - Abortion
KW - Stigma
KW - United States
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011365856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011365856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.011
DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 28161123
AN - SCOPUS:85011365856
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 177
SP - 259
EP - 268
JO - Social Science and Medicine
JF - Social Science and Medicine
ER -