TY - JOUR
T1 - Energy and reserve co-optimisation - Reserve availability, lost opportunity and uplift compensation cost
AU - Pavic, Ivan
AU - Dvorkin, Yury
AU - Pandžic, Hrvoje
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2018.
PY - 2019/1/22
Y1 - 2019/1/22
N2 - Ancillary services used for active power balancing are called balancing services or operating reserves and their provision is vital for maintaining power system frequency at the nominal value. In a deregulated environment, where generation is unbundled from transmission and distribution operations, independently owned generating companies may elect to provide operating reserves. However, it is not easy to calculate the exact cost of reserve provision and, therefore, bid for it accurately. Although the cost efficiency of reserve provision can be improved by co-optimising energy and reserve markets, generating companies can still encounter monetary losses caused by the provision of reserve. Currently, these losses are compensated based on ex-post calculations. Hence, current energy and reserve prices do not adequately factor in the ex-post compensation caused by reserve provision. This study proposes an energy and reserve co-optimisation with an explicit consideration of two compensation mechanisms, i.e. lost opportunity and uplift payments. The problem is structured as a bilevel model. The upper level is a mixed-integer unit commitment problem and the lower level is a continuous economic dispatch problem. The case study shows that the proposed model increases market efficiency.
AB - Ancillary services used for active power balancing are called balancing services or operating reserves and their provision is vital for maintaining power system frequency at the nominal value. In a deregulated environment, where generation is unbundled from transmission and distribution operations, independently owned generating companies may elect to provide operating reserves. However, it is not easy to calculate the exact cost of reserve provision and, therefore, bid for it accurately. Although the cost efficiency of reserve provision can be improved by co-optimising energy and reserve markets, generating companies can still encounter monetary losses caused by the provision of reserve. Currently, these losses are compensated based on ex-post calculations. Hence, current energy and reserve prices do not adequately factor in the ex-post compensation caused by reserve provision. This study proposes an energy and reserve co-optimisation with an explicit consideration of two compensation mechanisms, i.e. lost opportunity and uplift payments. The problem is structured as a bilevel model. The upper level is a mixed-integer unit commitment problem and the lower level is a continuous economic dispatch problem. The case study shows that the proposed model increases market efficiency.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060108477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060108477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5480
DO - 10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5480
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060108477
SN - 1751-8687
VL - 13
SP - 229
EP - 237
JO - IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution
JF - IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution
IS - 2
ER -