TY - JOUR
T1 - Energy policy with externalities and internalities
AU - Allcott, Hunt
AU - Mullainathan, Sendhil
AU - Taubinsky, Dmitry
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Ryan Bubb, Meghan Busse, Lucas Davis, Liran Einav, Larry Goulder, Michael Greenstone, Garth Heutel, Ryan Kellogg, Ted O'Donoghue, Jim Sallee, Josh Schwartzstein, Glen Weyl, Nathan Wozny, the two anonymous referees, and the seminar participants at the 2011 ASSA meetings, Duke, the Environmental Defense Fund, Harvard, MIT, NBER, New York University, the Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics, UC Santa Barbara, Universidad de los Andes, and Yale for the feedback and helpful conversations. We are grateful to the Sloan Foundation for the financial support of our research on the economics of energy efficiency. MATLAB code for replicating the analysis is available from Hunt Allcott's website.
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - We analyze optimal policy when consumers of energy-using durables undervalue energy costs relative to their private optima. First, there is an Internality Dividend from Externality Taxes: aside from reducing externalities, they also offset distortions from underinvestment in energy efficiency. Discrete choice simulations of the auto market suggest that the Internality Dividend could more than double the social welfare gains from a carbon tax at marginal damages. Second, we develop the Internality Targeting Principle: the optimal combination of multiple instruments depends on the average internality of the consumers marginal to each instrument. Because consumers who undervalue energy costs are mechanically less responsive to energy taxes, the optimal policy will tend to involve an energy tax below marginal damages coupled with a larger subsidy for energy efficient products. Third, although the exact optimal policy depends on joint distributions of unobservables which would be difficult to estimate, we develop formulas to closely approximate optimal policy and welfare effects based on reduced form "sufficient statistics" that can be estimated by using field experiments or quasi-experimental variation in product prices and energy costs.
AB - We analyze optimal policy when consumers of energy-using durables undervalue energy costs relative to their private optima. First, there is an Internality Dividend from Externality Taxes: aside from reducing externalities, they also offset distortions from underinvestment in energy efficiency. Discrete choice simulations of the auto market suggest that the Internality Dividend could more than double the social welfare gains from a carbon tax at marginal damages. Second, we develop the Internality Targeting Principle: the optimal combination of multiple instruments depends on the average internality of the consumers marginal to each instrument. Because consumers who undervalue energy costs are mechanically less responsive to energy taxes, the optimal policy will tend to involve an energy tax below marginal damages coupled with a larger subsidy for energy efficient products. Third, although the exact optimal policy depends on joint distributions of unobservables which would be difficult to estimate, we develop formulas to closely approximate optimal policy and welfare effects based on reduced form "sufficient statistics" that can be estimated by using field experiments or quasi-experimental variation in product prices and energy costs.
KW - Energy efficiency
KW - Energy-using durables
KW - Implied discount rates
KW - Inattention
KW - Internality taxes
KW - Optimal taxation
KW - Pigouvian taxes
KW - Present bias
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893392971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893392971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.01.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.01.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84893392971
SN - 0047-2727
VL - 112
SP - 72
EP - 88
JO - Journal of Public Economics
JF - Journal of Public Economics
ER -