Abstract
Drawing on insights from the epistemological work of the Jaina philosophers of classical India, I argue in defense of epistemic pluralism, the view that there are different but equally valid ways of knowing the world. The version of epistemic pluralism I defend is stance pluralism, a pluralism about epistemic stances or perspectives, understood to be policies or stratagems of knowing. I reject the view that the correct way to characterize epistemic pluralism is as consisting in a pluralism about epistemic systems.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-21 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Journal of the American Philosophical Association |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1 2019 |
Keywords
- Jaina philosophy
- Paul Boghossian
- epistemic pluralism
- stance
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy