TY - JOUR
T1 - Equilibrium effects of firm subsidies
AU - Rotemberg, Martin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Economic Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Subsidy programs have two countervailing effects on firms: Direct gains for eligible firms and indirect losses for those whose competitors are eligible. In 2006, India changed the eligibility criteria for small-firm subsidies, and the sales of newly eligible firms grew by roughly 35 percent. Competitors of the newly eligible firms were affected, with almost complete crowd-out within products that were less internationally traded, but little crowd-out for more-traded products. The newly eligible firms had relatively high marginal products, so relaxing the eligibility criteria for subsidies increased aggregate productivity by around 1-2 percent. Targeting different firms could have led to similar gains.
AB - Subsidy programs have two countervailing effects on firms: Direct gains for eligible firms and indirect losses for those whose competitors are eligible. In 2006, India changed the eligibility criteria for small-firm subsidies, and the sales of newly eligible firms grew by roughly 35 percent. Competitors of the newly eligible firms were affected, with almost complete crowd-out within products that were less internationally traded, but little crowd-out for more-traded products. The newly eligible firms had relatively high marginal products, so relaxing the eligibility criteria for subsidies increased aggregate productivity by around 1-2 percent. Targeting different firms could have led to similar gains.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072802484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072802484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1257/aer.20171840
DO - 10.1257/aer.20171840
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85072802484
SN - 0002-8282
VL - 109
SP - 3475
EP - 3513
JO - American Economic Review
JF - American Economic Review
IS - 10
ER -