(Neuron 109, 2967–2980.e1–e11; September 15, 2021) In the previously published version of this article, there was an error in the results section “Neural activity transitions between geometrically aligned ring attractor manifolds.” When quantifying manifold misalignment, the null distribution was miscalculated, such that the shuffle threshold was artificially high and, thus, the normalized manifold misalignment scores were artificially low. Correcting this error revealed that the manifolds were still more aligned than expected by chance in all sessions, as originally reported, albeit partially misaligned from the optimal rotation. Therefore, the parenthetical in the results section “(all were within 7% of the optimal rotation; Figure 7J)” should read “(all were more aligned than expected by chance, p < 0.025; Figure 7J),” and the corrected distribution of manifold misalignment scores is shown below in the corrected Figure 7J. The corrected code is now deposited in Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5940149, and the key resources table has been updated accordingly. These errors have now been corrected online. The authors apologize for the error.
ASJC Scopus subject areas