TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections
AU - CMMID COVID-19 Working Group
AU - The SAFER Investigators and Field Study Team
AU - The Crick COVID-19 Consortium
AU - Hellewell, Joel
AU - Russell, Timothy W.
AU - Matthews, Rebecca
AU - Severn, Abigail
AU - Adam, Sajida
AU - Enfield, Louise
AU - McBride, Angela
AU - Gärtner, Kathleen
AU - Edwards, Sarah
AU - Lorencatto, Fabiana
AU - Michie, Susan
AU - Manley, Ed
AU - Shahmanesh, Maryam
AU - Lukha, Hinal
AU - Prymas, Paulina
AU - McBain, Hazel
AU - Shortman, Robert
AU - Wood, Leigh
AU - Davies, Claudia
AU - Williams, Bethany
AU - Sanchez, Emilie
AU - Frampton, Daniel
AU - Byott, Matthew
AU - Paraskevopoulou, Stavroula M.
AU - Crayton, Elise
AU - Meyer, Carly
AU - Vora, Nina
AU - Gkouleli, Triantafylia
AU - Stoltenberg, Andrea
AU - Ranieri, Veronica
AU - Byrne, Tom
AU - Lewer, Dan
AU - Hayward, Andrew
AU - Gilson, Richard
AU - Walker, Naomi
AU - Ferron, Aaron
AU - Sait, Aaron
AU - Ramaprasad, Abhinay
AU - Perrin, Abigail
AU - Sateriale, Adam
AU - Sullivan, Adrienne E.
AU - Nelson, Aileen
AU - Madoo, Akshay
AU - Burrell, Alana
AU - Pajak, Aleksandra
AU - Gaiba, Alessandra
AU - Rossi, Alice
AU - Avola, Alida
AU - Dibbs, Alison
AU - Jit, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: Routine asymptomatic testing using RT-PCR of people who interact with vulnerable populations, such as medical staff in hospitals or care workers in care homes, has been employed to help prevent outbreaks among vulnerable populations. Although the peak sensitivity of RT-PCR can be high, the probability of detecting an infection will vary throughout the course of an infection. The effectiveness of routine asymptomatic testing will therefore depend on testing frequency and how PCR detection varies over time. Methods: We fitted a Bayesian statistical model to a dataset of twice weekly PCR tests of UK healthcare workers performed by self-administered nasopharyngeal swab, regardless of symptoms. We jointly estimated times of infection and the probability of a positive PCR test over time following infection; we then compared asymptomatic testing strategies by calculating the probability that a symptomatic infection is detected before symptom onset and the probability that an asymptomatic infection is detected within 7 days of infection. Results: We estimated that the probability that the PCR test detected infection peaked at 77% (54–88%) 4 days after infection, decreasing to 50% (38–65%) by 10 days after infection. Our results suggest a substantially higher probability of detecting infections 1–3 days after infection than previously published estimates. We estimated that testing every other day would detect 57% (33–76%) of symptomatic cases prior to onset and 94% (75–99%) of asymptomatic cases within 7 days if test results were returned within a day. Conclusions: Our results suggest that routine asymptomatic testing can enable detection of a high proportion of infected individuals early in their infection, provided that the testing is frequent and the time from testing to notification of results is sufficiently fast.
AB - Background: Routine asymptomatic testing using RT-PCR of people who interact with vulnerable populations, such as medical staff in hospitals or care workers in care homes, has been employed to help prevent outbreaks among vulnerable populations. Although the peak sensitivity of RT-PCR can be high, the probability of detecting an infection will vary throughout the course of an infection. The effectiveness of routine asymptomatic testing will therefore depend on testing frequency and how PCR detection varies over time. Methods: We fitted a Bayesian statistical model to a dataset of twice weekly PCR tests of UK healthcare workers performed by self-administered nasopharyngeal swab, regardless of symptoms. We jointly estimated times of infection and the probability of a positive PCR test over time following infection; we then compared asymptomatic testing strategies by calculating the probability that a symptomatic infection is detected before symptom onset and the probability that an asymptomatic infection is detected within 7 days of infection. Results: We estimated that the probability that the PCR test detected infection peaked at 77% (54–88%) 4 days after infection, decreasing to 50% (38–65%) by 10 days after infection. Our results suggest a substantially higher probability of detecting infections 1–3 days after infection than previously published estimates. We estimated that testing every other day would detect 57% (33–76%) of symptomatic cases prior to onset and 94% (75–99%) of asymptomatic cases within 7 days if test results were returned within a day. Conclusions: Our results suggest that routine asymptomatic testing can enable detection of a high proportion of infected individuals early in their infection, provided that the testing is frequent and the time from testing to notification of results is sufficiently fast.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Healthcare workers
KW - PCR testing
KW - Presymptomatic infections
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - Test sensitivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105905592&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105905592&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12916-021-01982-x
DO - 10.1186/s12916-021-01982-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 33902581
AN - SCOPUS:85105905592
SN - 1741-7015
VL - 19
JO - BMC Medicine
JF - BMC Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 106
ER -