Evaluating sampling biases from third-party reporting as a method for improving survey measures of sensitive behaviors

Stéphane Helleringer, jimi adams, Sara Yeatman, J. Mkandawire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Survey participants often misreport their sensitive behaviors (e.g., smoking, drinking, having sex) during interviews. Several studies have suggested that asking respondents to report the sensitive behaviors of their friends or confidants, rather than their own, might help address this problem. This is so because the “third-party reporting” (TPR) approach creates a surrogate sample of alters that may be less subject to social desirability biases. However, estimates of the prevalence of sensitive behaviors based on TPR assume that the surrogate sample of friends is representative of the population of interest. We used sociometric data on social networks in Likoma, Malawi to examine this assumption. Specifically, we use friendship network data to investigate whether friends have similar socio-economic characteristics as index respondents, and to measure possible correlations between the likelihood of inclusion in the surrogate sample and sensitive behaviors. From these results, we suggest approaches to strengthen estimates of the prevalence of sensitive behaviors obtained from TPR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)134-140
Number of pages7
JournalSocial Networks
Volume59
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2019

Keywords

  • Homophily
  • Measurement
  • Sampling biases
  • Sensitive behaviors
  • Survey methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating sampling biases from third-party reporting as a method for improving survey measures of sensitive behaviors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this