TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the impact of a continued maternal pertussis immunisation programme in England
T2 - A modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis
AU - Sandmann, Frank
AU - Jit, Mark
AU - Andrews, Nick
AU - Buckley, Hannah L.
AU - Campbell, Helen
AU - Ribeiro, Sonia
AU - Sile, Bersabeh
AU - Stowe, Julia
AU - Tessier, Elise
AU - Ramsay, Mary
AU - Amirthalingam, Gayatri
AU - Choi, Yoon H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/7/22
Y1 - 2021/7/22
N2 - Introduction: An unexpected resurgence of pertussis cases and infant deaths was observed in some countries that had switched to acellular pertussis vaccines in the primary immunisation schedule. In response to the outbreaks, maternal pertussis vaccination programmes in pregnant women have been adopted worldwide, including the USA in 2011 and the UK in 2012. Following the success of the programme in England, we evaluated the health and economic impact of stopping versus continuing the maternal pertussis immunisation to inform public health policy making. Methods: We used a mathematical model to estimate the number of infant hospitalisations and deaths related to pertussis in England over 2019–2038. Losses in quality-adjusted life years, QALYs, were considered for infants (aged 0–2 months) who survived or died from pertussis, bereaved parents (of infants who died from pertussis), and women with pertussis (aged 20–44 years). Direct medical costs to the National Health Service included infant hospitalisations, maternal vaccinations, and disease in women. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3.5%. Changes in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ICER, were explored in sensitivity analyses. Results: The model supports continuing the maternal pertussis immunisation programme as a cost-effective intervention at an ICER of £14,500/QALY (2.5% and 97.5%-quantile: £7,300/QALY to £32,400/QALY). Stopping versus continuing the maternal programme results in an estimated mean of 972 (range 582 to 1489) versus 308 (184 to 471) infant hospitalisations annually. Results were most sensitive to the number of hospitalisations and deaths when stopping the maternal programme. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of £30,000/QALY, the probability of the maternal programme being cost-effective was 96.2%. Conclusion: Our findings support continuing the maternal pertussis vaccination programme as otherwise higher levels of disease activity and infant mortality are expected to return. These results have led policy makers to decide to continue the maternal programme in the UK routine immunisation schedule.
AB - Introduction: An unexpected resurgence of pertussis cases and infant deaths was observed in some countries that had switched to acellular pertussis vaccines in the primary immunisation schedule. In response to the outbreaks, maternal pertussis vaccination programmes in pregnant women have been adopted worldwide, including the USA in 2011 and the UK in 2012. Following the success of the programme in England, we evaluated the health and economic impact of stopping versus continuing the maternal pertussis immunisation to inform public health policy making. Methods: We used a mathematical model to estimate the number of infant hospitalisations and deaths related to pertussis in England over 2019–2038. Losses in quality-adjusted life years, QALYs, were considered for infants (aged 0–2 months) who survived or died from pertussis, bereaved parents (of infants who died from pertussis), and women with pertussis (aged 20–44 years). Direct medical costs to the National Health Service included infant hospitalisations, maternal vaccinations, and disease in women. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3.5%. Changes in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ICER, were explored in sensitivity analyses. Results: The model supports continuing the maternal pertussis immunisation programme as a cost-effective intervention at an ICER of £14,500/QALY (2.5% and 97.5%-quantile: £7,300/QALY to £32,400/QALY). Stopping versus continuing the maternal programme results in an estimated mean of 972 (range 582 to 1489) versus 308 (184 to 471) infant hospitalisations annually. Results were most sensitive to the number of hospitalisations and deaths when stopping the maternal programme. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of £30,000/QALY, the probability of the maternal programme being cost-effective was 96.2%. Conclusion: Our findings support continuing the maternal pertussis vaccination programme as otherwise higher levels of disease activity and infant mortality are expected to return. These results have led policy makers to decide to continue the maternal programme in the UK routine immunisation schedule.
KW - Economic evaluation
KW - Maternal vaccination
KW - Mathematical model
KW - Pertussis
KW - Public health
KW - Resurgence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108860772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108860772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.042
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 34183204
AN - SCOPUS:85108860772
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 39
SP - 4500
EP - 4509
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
IS - 32
ER -