TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of community-academic partnership functioning
T2 - center for the elimination of hepatitis B health disparities.
AU - Vandevanter, Nancy
AU - Kwon, Simona
AU - Sim, Shao Chee
AU - Chun, Kay
AU - B Free CEED Coalition, Free CEED Coalition
AU - Trinh-Shevrin, Chau
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Process evaluation of community-academic partnership function and fidelity to principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR) is essential to achievement of intermediate and long term partnership goals. This article describes the evaluation of B Free CEED, a community-academic partnership created to address hepatitis health disparities in Asian American and Pacific Islander (API) communities. A mixed methods approach with an online survey and qualitative key informant interviews was conducted with all partnership members at baseline and follow-up, 18 months later. Survey findings showed stability over time, with some consistent differences in community and academic perspectives. Academic members were somewhat more satisfied with the partnership functioning. Key informant interviews provided contextual data key to further defining partnership functioning. Conducting ongoing partnership evaluations is necessary to reassess and align processes and protocols to enhance partnership functioning and strengthen group cohesion.
AB - Process evaluation of community-academic partnership function and fidelity to principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR) is essential to achievement of intermediate and long term partnership goals. This article describes the evaluation of B Free CEED, a community-academic partnership created to address hepatitis health disparities in Asian American and Pacific Islander (API) communities. A mixed methods approach with an online survey and qualitative key informant interviews was conducted with all partnership members at baseline and follow-up, 18 months later. Survey findings showed stability over time, with some consistent differences in community and academic perspectives. Academic members were somewhat more satisfied with the partnership functioning. Key informant interviews provided contextual data key to further defining partnership functioning. Conducting ongoing partnership evaluations is necessary to reassess and align processes and protocols to enhance partnership functioning and strengthen group cohesion.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856244361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856244361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1353/cpr.2011.0032
DO - 10.1353/cpr.2011.0032
M3 - Article
C2 - 22080771
AN - SCOPUS:84856244361
SN - 1557-0541
VL - 5
SP - 223
EP - 233
JO - Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action
JF - Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action
IS - 3
ER -