TY - JOUR
T1 - Exclusionary bargaining behavior in 14 countries
T2 - Prevalence and predictors
AU - Baranski, Andrzej
AU - Haas, Nicholas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of National Academy of Sciences.
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Primates are known to engage in exclusionary behavior, forming alliances to block a minority from accessing scarce resources. Humans are no exception, and examples of exclusionary behavior abound in political, business, and social settings. However, despite its socio-economic relevance, little is known about the prevalence and determinants of such behavior worldwide. Conducting an experimental game in which a group divides resources by majority rule, we document considerable global heterogeneity in exclusionary behavior. Whereas exclusion is modal in some countries, inclusive behavior is the norm in others. Despite significant cross-country variability, we nevertheless find that individual-level characteristics matter similarly across contexts. Men, individuals with a deliberative reasoning style, and ideologically right-leaning individuals, are consistently and substantially more exclusionary. Cross-country differences in the formation of exclusionary alliances correlate with an original Hierarchy Tolerance Index, derived from variables measuring cultural acceptance of power inequalities. Our findings carry important implications for decision-making bodies, as they indicate that the identity of decision-makers and the culture in which they are embedded can affect how equitably resources are divided.
AB - Primates are known to engage in exclusionary behavior, forming alliances to block a minority from accessing scarce resources. Humans are no exception, and examples of exclusionary behavior abound in political, business, and social settings. However, despite its socio-economic relevance, little is known about the prevalence and determinants of such behavior worldwide. Conducting an experimental game in which a group divides resources by majority rule, we document considerable global heterogeneity in exclusionary behavior. Whereas exclusion is modal in some countries, inclusive behavior is the norm in others. Despite significant cross-country variability, we nevertheless find that individual-level characteristics matter similarly across contexts. Men, individuals with a deliberative reasoning style, and ideologically right-leaning individuals, are consistently and substantially more exclusionary. Cross-country differences in the formation of exclusionary alliances correlate with an original Hierarchy Tolerance Index, derived from variables measuring cultural acceptance of power inequalities. Our findings carry important implications for decision-making bodies, as they indicate that the identity of decision-makers and the culture in which they are embedded can affect how equitably resources are divided.
KW - bargaining
KW - culture
KW - experiment
KW - gender
KW - ideology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216646101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85216646101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae553
DO - 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae553
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216646101
SN - 2752-6542
VL - 4
JO - PNAS Nexus
JF - PNAS Nexus
IS - 1
M1 - pgae553
ER -