Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines

Sarah Jane Leslie, Andrei Cimpian, Meredith Meyer, Edward Freeland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The gender imbalance in STEM subjects dominates current debates about women's underrepresentation in academia. However, women are well represented at the Ph.D. level in some sciences and poorly represented in some humanities (e.g., in 2011, 54% of U.S. Ph. D.'s in molecular biology were women versus only 31% in philosophy). We hypothesize that, across the academic spectrum, women are underrepresented in fields whose practitioners believe that raw, innate talent is the main requirement for success, because women are stereotyped as not possessing such talent. This hypothesis extends to African Americans' underrepresentation as well, as this group is subject to similar stereotypes. Results from a nationwide survey of academics support our hypothesis (termed the field-specific ability beliefs hypothesis) over three competing hypotheses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-265
Number of pages4
JournalScience
Volume347
Issue number6219
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 16 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this