TY - JOUR
T1 - Expected subjective value theory (ESVT)
T2 - A representation of decision under risk and certainty
AU - Glimcher, Paul W.
AU - Tymula, Agnieszka A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Tymula acknowledges the support from the Australian Research Council (DE150101032 and DP190100489) while working on this project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - We present a descriptive model of choice derived from neuroscientific models of efficient value representation in the brain. Our basic model, a special case of Expected Utility Theory, can capture a number of behaviors predicted by Prospect Theory. It achieves this with only two parameters: a time-indexed “payoff expectation” (reference point) and a free parameter we call “predisposition”. A simple extension of the model outside the domain of Expected Utility also captures the Allais Paradox. Our models shed new light on the computational origins and evolution of risk attitudes and aversion to outcomes below reward expectation (reference point). It delivers novel explanations of the endowment effect, the observed heterogeneity in probability weighting functions, and the Allais Paradox, all with fewer parameters and higher descriptive accuracy than Prospect Theory.
AB - We present a descriptive model of choice derived from neuroscientific models of efficient value representation in the brain. Our basic model, a special case of Expected Utility Theory, can capture a number of behaviors predicted by Prospect Theory. It achieves this with only two parameters: a time-indexed “payoff expectation” (reference point) and a free parameter we call “predisposition”. A simple extension of the model outside the domain of Expected Utility also captures the Allais Paradox. Our models shed new light on the computational origins and evolution of risk attitudes and aversion to outcomes below reward expectation (reference point). It delivers novel explanations of the endowment effect, the observed heterogeneity in probability weighting functions, and the Allais Paradox, all with fewer parameters and higher descriptive accuracy than Prospect Theory.
KW - Decision-making
KW - Expectation
KW - Neuroeconomics
KW - Normalization model
KW - Utility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146918955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146918955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.12.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.12.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85146918955
SN - 0167-2681
VL - 207
SP - 110
EP - 128
JO - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
JF - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
ER -