Explaining crossover and superiority as left-to-right evaluation

Chung Chieh Shan, Chris Barker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    We present a general theory of scope and binding in which both crossover and superiority violations are ruled out by one key assumption: that natural language expressions are normally evaluated (processed) from left to right. Our theory is an extension of Shan's (2002) account of multiple-wh questions, combining continuations (Barker, 2002) and dynamic type-shifting. Like other continuation-based analyses, but unlike most other treatments of crossover or superiority, our analysis is directly compositional (in the sense of, e.g., Jacobson, 1999). In particular, it does not postulate a level of Logical Form or any other representation distinct from surface syntax. One advantage of using continuations is that they are the standard tool for modeling order-of-evaluation in programming languages. This provides us with a natural and independently motivated characterization of what it means to evaluate expressions from left to right. We give a combinatory categorial grammar that models the syntax and the semantics of quantifier scope and wh-question formation. It allows quantificational binding but not crossover, in-situ wh but not superiority violations. In addition, the analysis automatically accounts for a variety of sentence types involving binding in the presence of pied piping, including reconstruction cases such as Whose criticism of his i mother did each person i resent?

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)91-134
    Number of pages44
    JournalLinguistics and Philosophy
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Feb 2006

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Philosophy
    • Linguistics and Language


    Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining crossover and superiority as left-to-right evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this