Fair Division in the Spratly Islands Conflict

David B.H. Denoon, Steven J. Brams

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter


    The legal basis for Chinese claims rests on three grounds: discovery, occupation, and repeated assertion of ownership. It has been established that Chinese sailors surveyed parts of the Spratlys during the Eastern Han dynasty, and that Chinese fishermen and traders frequented the area up until the 1600s. Although the Southeast Asian countries control most of the Spratly Islands, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) political leaders are aware that China's power and influence are likely to grow over time, so bargaining has advantages. The tangle of sovereignty claims makes clear that no country has both an unassailable legal basis and continuous occupancy to support its Spratly claims. Although imbroglios over the fisheries suggest the long-term marine potential of the Spratlys is significant, there is little doubt that the main economic potential of the region is in hydrocarbons. There has been a plethora of proposals for how to allocate sovereignty in the Spratlys.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationEnvironmental Conflict
    PublisherTaylor and Francis
    Number of pages26
    ISBN (Electronic)9780429969348
    ISBN (Print)9780813397542
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Social Sciences


    Dive into the research topics of 'Fair Division in the Spratly Islands Conflict'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this