Abstract
This paper does four things: (1) It provides an analysis of the concept ‘fake news.' (2) It identifies distinctive epistemic features of social media testimony. (3) It argues that partisanship-in-testimony-reception is not always epistemically vicious; in fact some forms of partisanship are consistent with individual epistemic virtue. (4) It argues that a solution to the problem of fake news will require changes to institutions, such as social media platforms, not just to individual epistemic practices.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | E-43-E-64 |
Journal | Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2017 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Health(social science)
- Health Policy
- History and Philosophy of Science