TY - JOUR
T1 - Family Communication in Long-Term Care During a Pandemic
T2 - Lessons for Enhancing Emotional Experiences
AU - Monin, Joan K.
AU - Ali, Talha
AU - Syed, Sumaiyah
AU - Piechota, Amanda
AU - Lepore, Michael
AU - Mourgues, Catalina
AU - Gaugler, Joseph E.
AU - Marottoli, Richard
AU - David, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Objective: Family visits with residents at long-term care (LTC) facilities have been restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective was to examine what communication methods, other than in-person visits, during the pandemic were associated with greater positive and lower negative emotional experiences for LTC residents and their family members and friends. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Nationally targeted online survey. Participants: One hundred sixty-one community-dwelling adults who had a family member or friend in a LTC facility. Measurements: The Positive and Negative Affect Scale was used to assess participant's own emotions and perceived resident emotions during the pandemic. Questions were asked about nine communication methods other than physical visits (e.g., phone, video-conference, e-mail, and letters) in terms of frequency of use during the pandemic. Sociodemographics, resident health, and facility factors were assessed and used as covariates where indicated. Results: During the pandemic, greater phone frequency was associated with less participant negative emotions (β = −0.17). Greater e-mail frequency was associated with more perceived resident positive emotions (β = 0.28). Greater frequency of letters delivered by staff was associated with more participant negative emotions (β = 0.23). Greater frequency of letters delivered by staff and the postal service were associated with more perceived resident negative emotions (β = 0.28; β = 0.34, respectively). Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of synchronous, familiar methods of communication like the phone and email between families and LTC residents to maintain their emotional well-being when in-person visits are restricted.
AB - Objective: Family visits with residents at long-term care (LTC) facilities have been restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective was to examine what communication methods, other than in-person visits, during the pandemic were associated with greater positive and lower negative emotional experiences for LTC residents and their family members and friends. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Nationally targeted online survey. Participants: One hundred sixty-one community-dwelling adults who had a family member or friend in a LTC facility. Measurements: The Positive and Negative Affect Scale was used to assess participant's own emotions and perceived resident emotions during the pandemic. Questions were asked about nine communication methods other than physical visits (e.g., phone, video-conference, e-mail, and letters) in terms of frequency of use during the pandemic. Sociodemographics, resident health, and facility factors were assessed and used as covariates where indicated. Results: During the pandemic, greater phone frequency was associated with less participant negative emotions (β = −0.17). Greater e-mail frequency was associated with more perceived resident positive emotions (β = 0.28). Greater frequency of letters delivered by staff was associated with more participant negative emotions (β = 0.23). Greater frequency of letters delivered by staff and the postal service were associated with more perceived resident negative emotions (β = 0.28; β = 0.34, respectively). Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of synchronous, familiar methods of communication like the phone and email between families and LTC residents to maintain their emotional well-being when in-person visits are restricted.
KW - Long term care facilities
KW - communication
KW - dementia
KW - emotion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091837464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091837464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.09.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.09.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 33004262
AN - SCOPUS:85091837464
SN - 1064-7481
VL - 28
SP - 1299
EP - 1307
JO - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
JF - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
IS - 12
ER -