TY - JOUR
T1 - Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation in Hospitalized Patients
T2 - A Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Ladapo, Joseph A.
AU - Tseng, Chi Hong
AU - Sherman, Scott E.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank our research staff for their many contributions to the study: Katherine French, Sasha Gonzalez, Amy Chen, Alissa R. Link, Sadozai Zoe Malik, Saahil Jumkhawala, Briesny Tejada, and Andrew White. Not least of all, we thank our patients who generously participated in the study. Funding: This study is funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Grant 74140) (JAL,SES) and NIH K24 DA038345 (SES).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Background: Financial incentives for smoking cessation and use of evidence-based therapy may increase quitting rates and reduce health and economic disparities. Methods: We randomized a low-income population of 182 hospitalized patients (mean age 58 years, 45% with high school education or less) to enhanced usual care, which included hospital-directed cessation care and Quitline referral or enhanced usual care plus financial incentives. All patients received enhanced usual care, while participants randomized to the financial incentives group were also eligible to receive up to $550 for participation in Quitline counseling ($50), participation in a community-based cessation program ($50), use of pharmacotherapy ($50), and biochemically confirmed smoking cessation at 2 months ($150) and 6 months ($250). Primary outcome was biochemically confirmed smoking cessation at 6 months after hospital discharge. Results: Total mean payment was $84 (standard deviation [SD] = $133) in the incentive group. The 6-month rate of biochemically confirmed smoking cessation was 19.6% in the incentive group and 8.9% in the enhanced usual care group (odds ratio [OR] 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 7.83, P = 0.10). Participants in the incentive group had higher rates of nicotine replacement therapy use (57.3% vs 31.3%, P = 0.002). Financial incentives did not improve subjective social status but did increase financial stress. Conclusions: Rates of bioconfirmed smoking cessation were higher among hospitalized patients randomized to financial incentives compared to usual care alone, but the difference was not significant. Considering the frequency of low payouts and the importance of assistance for successful quitting, future studies should explore the effectiveness of financial incentives sufficiently large to overcome barriers to evidence-based therapy.
AB - Background: Financial incentives for smoking cessation and use of evidence-based therapy may increase quitting rates and reduce health and economic disparities. Methods: We randomized a low-income population of 182 hospitalized patients (mean age 58 years, 45% with high school education or less) to enhanced usual care, which included hospital-directed cessation care and Quitline referral or enhanced usual care plus financial incentives. All patients received enhanced usual care, while participants randomized to the financial incentives group were also eligible to receive up to $550 for participation in Quitline counseling ($50), participation in a community-based cessation program ($50), use of pharmacotherapy ($50), and biochemically confirmed smoking cessation at 2 months ($150) and 6 months ($250). Primary outcome was biochemically confirmed smoking cessation at 6 months after hospital discharge. Results: Total mean payment was $84 (standard deviation [SD] = $133) in the incentive group. The 6-month rate of biochemically confirmed smoking cessation was 19.6% in the incentive group and 8.9% in the enhanced usual care group (odds ratio [OR] 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 7.83, P = 0.10). Participants in the incentive group had higher rates of nicotine replacement therapy use (57.3% vs 31.3%, P = 0.002). Financial incentives did not improve subjective social status but did increase financial stress. Conclusions: Rates of bioconfirmed smoking cessation were higher among hospitalized patients randomized to financial incentives compared to usual care alone, but the difference was not significant. Considering the frequency of low payouts and the importance of assistance for successful quitting, future studies should explore the effectiveness of financial incentives sufficiently large to overcome barriers to evidence-based therapy.
KW - FIESTA
KW - Financial Incentives
KW - Manhattan VA Hospital
KW - Smoking cessation
KW - Veterans
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081889184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081889184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.025
DO - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 31982494
AN - SCOPUS:85081889184
SN - 0002-9343
VL - 133
SP - 741
EP - 749
JO - American Journal of Medicine
JF - American Journal of Medicine
IS - 6
ER -