TY - JOUR
T1 - Food lobbies, the food pyramid, and U.S. nutrition policy
AU - Nestle, M.
PY - 1993
Y1 - 1993
N2 - The U.S. Department of Agriculture's 1991 withdrawal of its Eating Right Pyramid food guide in response to pressure from meat and dairy producers was only the latest in a long series of industry attempts to influence federal dietary recommendations. Such attempts began when diet-related health problems in the United States shifted in prevalence from nutrient deficiencies to chronic diseases, and dietary advice shifted from 'eat more' to 'eat less.' The Pyramid controversy focuses attention on the conflict between federal protection of the rights of food lobbyists to act in their own self-interest, and federal responsibility to promote the nutritional health of the public. Since 1977, for example, under pressure from meat producers, federal dietary advice has evolved from 'decrease consumption of meat' to 'have two or three (daily) servings.' Thus, this recent incident also highlights the inherent conflict of interest in the Department of Agriculture's dual mandates to promote U.S. agricultural products and to advise the public about healthy food choices.
AB - The U.S. Department of Agriculture's 1991 withdrawal of its Eating Right Pyramid food guide in response to pressure from meat and dairy producers was only the latest in a long series of industry attempts to influence federal dietary recommendations. Such attempts began when diet-related health problems in the United States shifted in prevalence from nutrient deficiencies to chronic diseases, and dietary advice shifted from 'eat more' to 'eat less.' The Pyramid controversy focuses attention on the conflict between federal protection of the rights of food lobbyists to act in their own self-interest, and federal responsibility to promote the nutritional health of the public. Since 1977, for example, under pressure from meat producers, federal dietary advice has evolved from 'decrease consumption of meat' to 'have two or three (daily) servings.' Thus, this recent incident also highlights the inherent conflict of interest in the Department of Agriculture's dual mandates to promote U.S. agricultural products and to advise the public about healthy food choices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027240050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027240050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2190/32F2-2PFB-MEG7-8HPU
DO - 10.2190/32F2-2PFB-MEG7-8HPU
M3 - Review article
C2 - 8375951
AN - SCOPUS:0027240050
SN - 0020-7314
VL - 23
SP - 483
EP - 496
JO - International Journal of Health Services
JF - International Journal of Health Services
IS - 3
ER -