Abstract
This research examines how the method of selecting women leaders affects other women's leadership interest. The results of three experiments (N = 1,015) indicated that only when women leaders were selected due to merit, not quota-based policies, did they boost female participants’ interest in a leadership position. These reactions were mediated by perceptions of the woman leader's deservingness of her position (Studies 1–3) and consequent acceptance as a role model (Studies 2 and 3). Accordingly, success information validating quota-based selected leaders’ competence provided a boost in leadership interest equal to that of merit-based selected leaders (Study 2). For male participants, quota but not merit-based selected women leaders lowered interest in leadership due to their pessimistic assessment of the probability of being selected (Study 1). These results suggest that a wise implementation of quota regulations includes validating women's competence so they are perceived as deserving of their leader roles and can thus serve as inspiring role models.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 129-146 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | European Journal of Social Psychology |
Volume | 53 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2023 |
Keywords
- gender quotas
- leadership aspirations
- perception of deservingness
- role models
- selection policy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology