TY - JOUR
T1 - From the Artist’s Contract to the blockchain ledger
T2 - new forms of artists’ funding using equity and resale royalties
AU - van Haaften-Schick, Lauren
AU - Whitaker, Amy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Although the Artist’s Contract, first developed in 1971, was not broadly adopted in its early decades, renewed interest in it fifty years later has led to inventive related structures that are enabled by blockchain technology, in particular the phenomenon of NFT (non-fungible token) sales in art. We argue that the Contract’s conceptual roots have laid groundwork for a potentially powerful funding mechanism via the Contract’s resale royalties terms. Blockchain technology radically alters risks of incomplete contracting and lowers transaction costs, making the Quixotic terms of the Artist’s Contract newly actionable. We study the artist Hans Haacke’s longtime experimentation with the Artist’s Contract, along with contemporary data from the blockchain registry SuperRare, which pays royalties to artists. Blockchain companies such as SuperRare generally sell digital works outside the taste-making and gatekeeping systems of the upper echelons of the traditional art market. This arc from conceptual practice within the arts to commercial practice at the edge of the traditional art market points to the Contract’s legacy as a model for potentially disruptive technology and a new fundraising model for artists.
AB - Although the Artist’s Contract, first developed in 1971, was not broadly adopted in its early decades, renewed interest in it fifty years later has led to inventive related structures that are enabled by blockchain technology, in particular the phenomenon of NFT (non-fungible token) sales in art. We argue that the Contract’s conceptual roots have laid groundwork for a potentially powerful funding mechanism via the Contract’s resale royalties terms. Blockchain technology radically alters risks of incomplete contracting and lowers transaction costs, making the Quixotic terms of the Artist’s Contract newly actionable. We study the artist Hans Haacke’s longtime experimentation with the Artist’s Contract, along with contemporary data from the blockchain registry SuperRare, which pays royalties to artists. Blockchain companies such as SuperRare generally sell digital works outside the taste-making and gatekeeping systems of the upper echelons of the traditional art market. This arc from conceptual practice within the arts to commercial practice at the edge of the traditional art market points to the Contract’s legacy as a model for potentially disruptive technology and a new fundraising model for artists.
KW - Art markets
KW - Artist’s Contract
KW - Blockchain
KW - Contract law (K12)
KW - Economic sociology (Z13)
KW - Economics of art and literature (Z11)
KW - Hans Haacke
KW - Intellectual property and intellectual capital (O34)
KW - Property rights (P14)
KW - SuperRare
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125058217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125058217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10824-022-09445-8
DO - 10.1007/s10824-022-09445-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125058217
SN - 0885-2545
VL - 46
SP - 287
EP - 315
JO - Journal of Cultural Economics
JF - Journal of Cultural Economics
IS - 2
ER -