Abstract
In 'Just what is full-blooded platonism?' Greg Restall outlines several objections to Mark Balaguer's theory of full-blooded platonism. I reply to these objections by explicating the semantic framework for the reference of mathematical terms that full-blooded platonism requires. Expanding upon these replies, I then explain how the full-blooded platonist, in light of the explicated semantic framework, should treat mathematical terms and statements in order to avoid certain pitfalls.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 357-365 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Philosophia Mathematica |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2007 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Mathematics
- Philosophy