TY - JOUR
T1 - Future-event schemas
T2 - Automaticity and rumination in major depression
AU - Andersen, Susan M.
AU - Limpert, Christie
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was funded in part by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH48789). Special thanks are due to Moy Wong for writing the computer program for the experiment and to Meghan Gallagher for serving as a research assistant.
PY - 2001/6
Y1 - 2001/6
N2 - We examined the proposition that individuals with major depression make predictions about future events relatively automatically and pessimistically, reflecting use of a future-event schema, while they also ruminate about the future. Depressed participants and nondepressed controls indicated whether or not various positive and negative future events would happen to them or to an average other - either under a concurrent attentional load or no such load - while their response latencies were assessed. As hypothesized, depressives showed relatively greater automaticity in their predictions than did nondepressives, and a lack of optimism as well. More specifically, depressives showed a smaller increase in response latency due to the introduction of the attentional load than did nondepressives, suggesting relatively greater processing efficiency, and they also predicted reliably fewer positive events. Indeed, depressives also reported ruminating more about the future based on a recent distressing life event. Overall, the results extend research on future-event schemas and automaticity (Andersen, Spielman, & Bargh, 1992) from moderate to major depression and establish a link with future-event rumination.
AB - We examined the proposition that individuals with major depression make predictions about future events relatively automatically and pessimistically, reflecting use of a future-event schema, while they also ruminate about the future. Depressed participants and nondepressed controls indicated whether or not various positive and negative future events would happen to them or to an average other - either under a concurrent attentional load or no such load - while their response latencies were assessed. As hypothesized, depressives showed relatively greater automaticity in their predictions than did nondepressives, and a lack of optimism as well. More specifically, depressives showed a smaller increase in response latency due to the introduction of the attentional load than did nondepressives, suggesting relatively greater processing efficiency, and they also predicted reliably fewer positive events. Indeed, depressives also reported ruminating more about the future based on a recent distressing life event. Overall, the results extend research on future-event schemas and automaticity (Andersen, Spielman, & Bargh, 1992) from moderate to major depression and establish a link with future-event rumination.
KW - cognition
KW - depression
KW - rumination
KW - schemas
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0043156843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0043156843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1026447600924
DO - 10.1023/A:1026447600924
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0043156843
SN - 0147-5916
VL - 25
SP - 311
EP - 333
JO - Cognitive Therapy and Research
JF - Cognitive Therapy and Research
IS - 3
ER -