Gender and Gender-Role Attitudes in Wage Negotiations: Evidence from an Online Experiment

Melisa Demirović, Jonathan Rogers, Blaine G. Robbins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Gender differences in wage negotiations have been offered as a popular explanation for why the gender gap in pay persists in the United States. In this study, we use data from an artificial wage negotiation experiment (N = 307) to examine the relationship between gender and wage negotiations and to test whether gender-role attitudes moderate this relationship. We find that gender-role attitudes moderate how gender influences the decision to negotiate, but not the outcomes of negotiations, and that forced negotiations do not lead to additional gains for women regardless of their gender-role attitudes. We conclude with a discussion of implications and directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-308
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Psychology Quarterly
Volume87
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Keywords

  • gender
  • gender-role attitudes
  • online experiment
  • wage negotiations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender and Gender-Role Attitudes in Wage Negotiations: Evidence from an Online Experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this