TY - JOUR
T1 - Getting the price right
T2 - How some countries control spending in a fee-for-service system
AU - Gusmano, Michael K.
AU - Laugesen, Miriam
AU - Rodwin, Victor G.
AU - Brown, Lawrence D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors received travel support from the Columbia Mailman School of Public Health Faculty Grant program. The authors thank the Columbia Mailman School of Public Health for its support of this research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Project HOPE— The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Although the US has the highest health care prices in the world, the specific mechanisms commonly used by other countries to set and update prices are often overlooked, with a tendency to favor strategies such as reducing the use of fee-for-service reimbursement. Comparing policies in three high-income countries (France, Germany, and Japan), we describe how payers and physicians engage in structured fee negotiations and standardize prices in systems where fee-for-service is the main model of outpatient physician reimbursement. The parties involved, the frequency of fee schedule updates, and the scope of the negotiations vary, but all three countries attempt to balance the interests of payers with those of physician associations. Instead of looking for policy importation, this analysis demonstrates the benefits of structuring negotiations and standardizing fee-for-service payments independent of any specific reform proposal, such as single-payer reform and public insurance buy-ins.
AB - Although the US has the highest health care prices in the world, the specific mechanisms commonly used by other countries to set and update prices are often overlooked, with a tendency to favor strategies such as reducing the use of fee-for-service reimbursement. Comparing policies in three high-income countries (France, Germany, and Japan), we describe how payers and physicians engage in structured fee negotiations and standardize prices in systems where fee-for-service is the main model of outpatient physician reimbursement. The parties involved, the frequency of fee schedule updates, and the scope of the negotiations vary, but all three countries attempt to balance the interests of payers with those of physician associations. Instead of looking for policy importation, this analysis demonstrates the benefits of structuring negotiations and standardizing fee-for-service payments independent of any specific reform proposal, such as single-payer reform and public insurance buy-ins.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095402127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095402127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01804
DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01804
M3 - Article
C2 - 33136495
AN - SCOPUS:85095402127
SN - 0278-2715
VL - 39
SP - 1867
EP - 1874
JO - Health Affairs
JF - Health Affairs
IS - 11
ER -