TY - JOUR
T1 - Getting to the truth
T2 - Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns
AU - Farrelly, Matthew C.
AU - Healton, Cheryl G.
AU - Davis, Kevin C.
AU - Messeri, Peter
AU - Hersey, James C.
AU - Haviland, M. Lyndon
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Objectives. This study examines how the American Legacy Foundation's "truth" campaign and Philip Morris's "Think. Don't Smoke" campaign have influenced youths' attitudes, beliefs, and intentions toward tobacco. Methods. We analyzed 2 telephone surveys of 12- to 17-year-olds with multivariate logistic regressions: a baseline survey conducted before the launch of "truth" and a second survey 10 months into the "truth" campaign. Results. Exposure to "truth" countermarketing advertisements was consistently associated with an increase in anti-tobacco attitudes and beliefs, whereas exposure to Philip Morris advertisements generally was not. In addition, those exposed to Philip Morris advertisements were more likely to be open to the idea of smoking. Conclusions. Whereas exposure to the "truth" campaign positively changed youths' attitudes toward tobacco, the Philip Morris campaign had a counterproductive influence.
AB - Objectives. This study examines how the American Legacy Foundation's "truth" campaign and Philip Morris's "Think. Don't Smoke" campaign have influenced youths' attitudes, beliefs, and intentions toward tobacco. Methods. We analyzed 2 telephone surveys of 12- to 17-year-olds with multivariate logistic regressions: a baseline survey conducted before the launch of "truth" and a second survey 10 months into the "truth" campaign. Results. Exposure to "truth" countermarketing advertisements was consistently associated with an increase in anti-tobacco attitudes and beliefs, whereas exposure to Philip Morris advertisements generally was not. In addition, those exposed to Philip Morris advertisements were more likely to be open to the idea of smoking. Conclusions. Whereas exposure to the "truth" campaign positively changed youths' attitudes toward tobacco, the Philip Morris campaign had a counterproductive influence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036099387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036099387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.92.6.901
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.92.6.901
M3 - Article
C2 - 12036775
AN - SCOPUS:0036099387
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 92
SP - 901
EP - 907
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 6
ER -