TY - JOUR
T1 - Golf courses as habitat for aquatic turtles in urbanized landscapes
AU - Winchell, Kristin M.
AU - Gibbs, James P.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and United States Golf Association ’s Turfgrass and Environmental Research Program for funding through the Wildlife Links program (NFWF PROJECT: 2008-0058-001). Special thanks to the golf courses in Syracuse, NY included in this study and the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation providing access to wildlife refuges in the region. Assistants A. Krofta and S. Quinn provided valuable help in the field and M. Palmer and F. Corsi (Columbia University) provided support and advice in the completion of this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Golf courses host some of the only semi-natural aquatic habitats in urban areas. We assessed whether golf course wetlands could provide habitat refuges for freshwater turtles, which are threatened worldwide by wetland loss and degradation associated with urbanization. In 2009 and 2010 we examined populations of snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) and painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) and their habitats in 88 wetlands near Syracuse, New York, USA in golf courses, urban areas, and wildlife refuges. We tested two null hypotheses: (1) golf courses provide habitats comparable to nearby urban and protected areas, and (2) turtle populations in these contexts are comparable. Golf course wetlands were surrounded by low road density and were distinct from protected area wetlands only in that they were surrounded by less forest and grassland and had more homogenous aquatic plant communities. In terms of turtle populations, relative abundance was equivalent in protected area and golf course wetlands and female fraction was closer to parity in golf course wetlands. Painted turtles were of similar size across contexts and snapping turtles were smaller in urban and golf course contexts. Additionally, male turtles in golf courses were relatively heavier and both species had less severe indicators of poor health. Golf course wetlands apparently supported viable turtle populations similar to those observed in protected areas in the region. Nevertheless, turtle habitat on golf courses can be improved by increasing the area of wetlands, increasing their shape complexity, promoting vegetative diversity in and around wetlands, and increasing surrounding forest and grassland.
AB - Golf courses host some of the only semi-natural aquatic habitats in urban areas. We assessed whether golf course wetlands could provide habitat refuges for freshwater turtles, which are threatened worldwide by wetland loss and degradation associated with urbanization. In 2009 and 2010 we examined populations of snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) and painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) and their habitats in 88 wetlands near Syracuse, New York, USA in golf courses, urban areas, and wildlife refuges. We tested two null hypotheses: (1) golf courses provide habitats comparable to nearby urban and protected areas, and (2) turtle populations in these contexts are comparable. Golf course wetlands were surrounded by low road density and were distinct from protected area wetlands only in that they were surrounded by less forest and grassland and had more homogenous aquatic plant communities. In terms of turtle populations, relative abundance was equivalent in protected area and golf course wetlands and female fraction was closer to parity in golf course wetlands. Painted turtles were of similar size across contexts and snapping turtles were smaller in urban and golf course contexts. Additionally, male turtles in golf courses were relatively heavier and both species had less severe indicators of poor health. Golf course wetlands apparently supported viable turtle populations similar to those observed in protected areas in the region. Nevertheless, turtle habitat on golf courses can be improved by increasing the area of wetlands, increasing their shape complexity, promoting vegetative diversity in and around wetlands, and increasing surrounding forest and grassland.
KW - Chelydra serpentina
KW - Chrysemys picta
KW - Management
KW - Road mortality
KW - Urbanization
KW - Wetland
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960854557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960854557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.001
DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84960854557
SN - 0169-2046
VL - 147
SP - 59
EP - 70
JO - Landscape and Urban Planning
JF - Landscape and Urban Planning
ER -