Abstract
The author critiques Gordon's influential analysis of the National Association of Social Workers'working definition of social work practice (WD). Gordon's critique contains well-founded objections leading to the elimination of the WD's method, purpose, and sanction components. However, Gordon's implied conclusion that social work can be defined by a broad value (i.e., self-realization) and a distinctive knowledge domain (i.e., social transactions) involves fundamental errors repeated in subsequent definitional attempts. Rather than being distinguished by a unique knowledge domain, social work, like other professions, must be defined by a value that is distinctive of the profession yet shared by all social work fields.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 284-298 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Research on Social Work Practice |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2003 |
Keywords
- Conceptual foundations
- Definition
- Knowledge base
- Social work
- Values
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Psychology