TY - JOUR
T1 - Group size, turnout, and political alignments and the development of U.S. party coalitions, 1960-1992
AU - Manza, Jeff
AU - Brooks, Clem
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - We propose an approach for analysing trends in the contributions of social groups to electoral coalitions, and apply this approach to an analysis of the impact of changes in the race, religion, class, and gender cleavages on coalitions in U.S. Presidential elections between 1960 and 1992. We improve on existing studies of party coalitions by developing a multivariate model that measures group-specific political alignments while also correcting for changes in group size and turnout rates. Our analyses show that there have been significant changes in the contributions of different social groups to major party coalitions: the Democrats now receive more votes from professionals (and to a lesser extent, managers), blacks, and non-religious persons, and fewer votes from working-class voters; the Republican coalition has gained among managers (and to a lesser extent, professionals), while losing out significantly among liberal Protestants, blacks, and non-working voters. The analyses provide evidence of a slight convergence amidst a larger pattern of enduring group-based differences within the Democratic and Republican coalitions. The approach developed here can readily be extended to study electoral coalitions in other national contexts.
AB - We propose an approach for analysing trends in the contributions of social groups to electoral coalitions, and apply this approach to an analysis of the impact of changes in the race, religion, class, and gender cleavages on coalitions in U.S. Presidential elections between 1960 and 1992. We improve on existing studies of party coalitions by developing a multivariate model that measures group-specific political alignments while also correcting for changes in group size and turnout rates. Our analyses show that there have been significant changes in the contributions of different social groups to major party coalitions: the Democrats now receive more votes from professionals (and to a lesser extent, managers), blacks, and non-religious persons, and fewer votes from working-class voters; the Republican coalition has gained among managers (and to a lesser extent, professionals), while losing out significantly among liberal Protestants, blacks, and non-working voters. The analyses provide evidence of a slight convergence amidst a larger pattern of enduring group-based differences within the Democratic and Republican coalitions. The approach developed here can readily be extended to study electoral coalitions in other national contexts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033475556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033475556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018271
DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018271
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0033475556
SN - 0266-7215
VL - 15
SP - 369
EP - 389
JO - European Sociological Review
JF - European Sociological Review
IS - 4
ER -