Guarding the Guardians: Legislative self-policing and electoral corruption in Victorian Britain

Andrew C. Eggers, Arthur Spirling

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    We offer an institutional explanation for the dramatic decline in corrupt practices that characterizes British political development in the mass suffrage era. Parliamentary candidates who faced corruption charges were judged by tribunals of sitting MPs until 1868, when this responsibility was passed to the courts. We draw on theory and empirical evidence to demonstrate that delegating responsibility over corruption trials to judges was an important institutional step in cleaning up elections. By focusing on an institutional explanation for Victorian electoral corruption (and its demise), we provide an account that complements the existing literature while offering clearer implications for contemporary policy debates.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)337-370
    Number of pages34
    JournalQuarterly Journal of Political Science
    Volume9
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Political Science and International Relations

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Guarding the Guardians: Legislative self-policing and electoral corruption in Victorian Britain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this