Abstract
Processes of unbounded spreading are often claimed to be myopic (e.g. Wilson 2003, McCarthy 2009): The ability of some feature [F] to spread from some segment z to some segment y does not depend on its ability to spread from y to x. Recent work (e.g. Walker 2010, 2014; Jardine 2016) has however cast doubt on the universality of this claim. This paper contributes to the discussion on (non-)myopia on by suggesting that a kind of non-myopic process, trigger deletion, is attested in Gurindji (Pama-Nyungan, McConvell 1988): When the spreading domain contains a certain kind of blocking segment, the spreading trigger deletes. In order to capture this pattern, as well as the extant typology of non-myopic processes, I argue that any successful analysis of unbounded spreading must allow surface candidates to be globally evaluated.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 157-195 |
Number of pages | 39 |
Journal | Journal of Linguistics |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1 2020 |
Keywords
- dissimilation
- nasal-stop clusters
- non-myopia
- phonology
- spreading
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Philosophy
- Linguistics and Language