TY - JOUR
T1 - Heterogeneous preferences and the effects of incentives in promoting conservation agriculture in Malawi
AU - Ward, Patrick S.
AU - Bell, Andrew R.
AU - Parkhurst, Gregory M.
AU - Droppelmann, Klaus
AU - Mapemba, Lawrence
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is part of the project entitled ‘Agglomeration Payments for Catchment Conservation in Malawi—NE/L001624/1’, which was partly funded with support from the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) program. The ESPA program is funded by the Department for International Development (DFID), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). This work was further supported through a grant from the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Collaborative Research on Assets and Market Access (BASIS AMA), funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Additional support was provided by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets. The editor and an anonymous reviewer provided valuable comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Any remaining errors are our own.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/4/15
Y1 - 2016/4/15
N2 - There is a great deal of interest in increasing food security through the sustainable intensification of food production in developing countries around the world. One such approach is through Conservation Agriculture (CA), which improves soil quality through a suite of farming practices that reduce soil disturbance, increase soil cover through retained crop residues, and increase crop diversification. We use discrete choice experiments to study farmers' preferences for these different CA practices, and assess willingness to adopt CA. Despite many long-term agronomic benefits, some farmers are not willing to adopt CA without incentives. Our results suggest that farmers perceive that CA practices interact with one another differently, sometimes complementing and sometimes degrading the benefits of the other practices. But our results also indicate that preferences are a function of experiences with CA, such that current farm level practices influence willingness to adopt the full CA package. Further, exposure to various risks such as flooding and insect infestations often constrains adoption. Providing subsidies can increase likely adoption of a full CA package, but may generate some perverse incentives that can result in subsequent disadoption.
AB - There is a great deal of interest in increasing food security through the sustainable intensification of food production in developing countries around the world. One such approach is through Conservation Agriculture (CA), which improves soil quality through a suite of farming practices that reduce soil disturbance, increase soil cover through retained crop residues, and increase crop diversification. We use discrete choice experiments to study farmers' preferences for these different CA practices, and assess willingness to adopt CA. Despite many long-term agronomic benefits, some farmers are not willing to adopt CA without incentives. Our results suggest that farmers perceive that CA practices interact with one another differently, sometimes complementing and sometimes degrading the benefits of the other practices. But our results also indicate that preferences are a function of experiences with CA, such that current farm level practices influence willingness to adopt the full CA package. Further, exposure to various risks such as flooding and insect infestations often constrains adoption. Providing subsidies can increase likely adoption of a full CA package, but may generate some perverse incentives that can result in subsequent disadoption.
KW - Conservation agriculture
KW - Discrete choice experiments
KW - Malawi
KW - Technology adoption
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957629116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957629116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.005
DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84957629116
SN - 0167-8809
VL - 222
SP - 67
EP - 79
JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
ER -