TY - JOUR
T1 - “Hey, We Can Do This Together”
T2 - Findings from an Evaluation of a Multi-sectoral Community Coalition
AU - Realmuto, Lindsey
AU - Weiss, Linda
AU - Masseo, Patrick
AU - Madondo, Kumbie
AU - Kumar, Rashi
AU - Beane, Susan
AU - Pagán, José A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Multi-sectoral coalitions focused on systemic health inequities are commonly promoted as important mechanisms to facilitate changes with lasting impacts on population health. However, the development and implementation of such initiatives present significant challenges, and evaluation results are commonly inconclusive. In an effort to add to the evidence base, we conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of the Claremont Healthy Village Initiative, a multi-sectoral partnership based in the Bronx, New York City. At an organizational level, there were positive outcomes with respect to expanded services, increased access to resources for programs, improved linkages, better coordination, and empowerment of local leaders—all consistent with a systemic, community building approach to change. Direct impacts on community members were more difficult to assess: perceived access to health and other services improved, while community violence and poor sanitation, which were also priorities for community members, remained important challenges. Findings suggest significant progress, as well as continued need.
AB - Multi-sectoral coalitions focused on systemic health inequities are commonly promoted as important mechanisms to facilitate changes with lasting impacts on population health. However, the development and implementation of such initiatives present significant challenges, and evaluation results are commonly inconclusive. In an effort to add to the evidence base, we conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of the Claremont Healthy Village Initiative, a multi-sectoral partnership based in the Bronx, New York City. At an organizational level, there were positive outcomes with respect to expanded services, increased access to resources for programs, improved linkages, better coordination, and empowerment of local leaders—all consistent with a systemic, community building approach to change. Direct impacts on community members were more difficult to assess: perceived access to health and other services improved, while community violence and poor sanitation, which were also priorities for community members, remained important challenges. Findings suggest significant progress, as well as continued need.
KW - Multi-sectoral coalitions
KW - community building
KW - health inequity
KW - program evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089542057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089542057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11524-020-00473-3
DO - 10.1007/s11524-020-00473-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 32808080
AN - SCOPUS:85089542057
SN - 1099-3460
VL - 98
SP - 687
EP - 694
JO - Journal of Urban Health
JF - Journal of Urban Health
IS - 5
ER -