Hikikomori and the false positives challenge: Comment on Amendola's “Clarifying the position of hikikomori in mental health

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

Amendola's review raises the question of whether some variants of hikikomori-type social withdrawal are not mental disorders but rather psychologically normal-range attempts to cope with a changing social environment that is unlike the one for which human beings were biologically designed. To place this question in context, I survey issues regarding the prevention of false-positive diagnoses of problematic non-disordered conditions as disorders. I offer a series of examples of other categories in which such errors have occurred and sometimes been corrected, drawing parallels to and implications for the consideration of hikikomori. I argue that hikikomori offers an opportunity for reflection on how novel problematic behaviors can be assessed for disordered versus non-disordered variants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Pacific Rim Psychology
Volume18
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Keywords

  • false-positive diagnosis
  • harmful dysfunction
  • hikikomori
  • psychiatric disorder
  • psychiatric nosology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences
  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hikikomori and the false positives challenge: Comment on Amendola's “Clarifying the position of hikikomori in mental health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this