Holocene transgression in south-central Long Island, New York( USA) - reply.

M. R. Rampino; J. E. Sanders

Holocene transgression in south-central Long Island, New York( USA) - reply.

Biology and Genomics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The reply consists of: 1) responses to specific points made by Swift and Moslow, 2) a discussion of the origin and evolution of these ideas, and 3) a discussion of the utility of these ideas in predicting and explaining the stratigraphic record of marine transgressions.-from Authors

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1020-1025
Number of pages	6
Journal	Journal of Sedimentary Petrology
Volume	52
Issue number	3
State	Published - 1982

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Environmental Science
General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Cite this

@article{48fe17001e7347f5b59448eea8ced591,

title = "Holocene transgression in south-central Long Island, New York( USA) - reply.",

abstract = "The reply consists of: 1) responses to specific points made by Swift and Moslow, 2) a discussion of the origin and evolution of these ideas, and 3) a discussion of the utility of these ideas in predicting and explaining the stratigraphic record of marine transgressions.-from Authors",

author = "Rampino, {M. R.} and Sanders, {J. E.}",

year = "1982",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "52",

pages = "1020--1025",

journal = "Journal of Sedimentary Petrology",

issn = "0022-4472",

publisher = "Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Holocene transgression in south-central Long Island, New York( USA) - reply.

AU - Rampino, M. R.

AU - Sanders, J. E.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - The reply consists of: 1) responses to specific points made by Swift and Moslow, 2) a discussion of the origin and evolution of these ideas, and 3) a discussion of the utility of these ideas in predicting and explaining the stratigraphic record of marine transgressions.-from Authors

AB - The reply consists of: 1) responses to specific points made by Swift and Moslow, 2) a discussion of the origin and evolution of these ideas, and 3) a discussion of the utility of these ideas in predicting and explaining the stratigraphic record of marine transgressions.-from Authors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020418421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020418421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0020418421

SN - 0022-4472

VL - 52

SP - 1020

EP - 1025

JO - Journal of Sedimentary Petrology

JF - Journal of Sedimentary Petrology

IS - 3

ER -

Holocene transgression in south-central Long Island, New York( USA) - reply.

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this