Home and workplace smoking bans in Italy, Ireland, Sweden, France and the Czech Republic

J. E. Heck, I. Stücker, S. Allwright, E. R. Gritz, M. Haglund, C. G. Healton, E. Kralikova, S. Sanchez Del Mazo, E. Tamang, C. M. Dresler, M. Hashibe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The purpose of this study was to report predictors and prevalence of home and workplace smoking bans in five European countries. We conducted a population-based telephone survey of 4,977 females, ascertaining factors associated with smoking bans. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were derived using unconditional logistic regression. A complete home smoking ban was reported by 59.5% of French, 63.5% of Irish, 61.3% of Italian, 74.4% of Czech and 87.0% of Swedish females. Home smoking bans were associated with younger age and being bothered by secondhand smoke, and among smokers, inversely associated with greater tobacco dependence. Among nonsmokers, bans were also related to believing smoking is harmful (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.30) and having parents who smoke (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.52-0.73). Workplace bans were reported by 92.6% of French, 96.5% of Irish, 77.9% of Italian, 79.1% of Czech and 88.1% of Swedish females. Workplace smoking bans were reported less often among those in technical positions (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.82) and among skilled workers (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.88) than among professional workers. Workplace smoking bans are in place for most workers in these countries. Having a home smoking ban was based on smoking behaviour, demographics, beliefs and personal preference. Copyright

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)969-979
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2010


  • Family
  • Females
  • Passive smoking
  • Social class
  • Tobacco
  • Tobacco dependence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Home and workplace smoking bans in Italy, Ireland, Sweden, France and the Czech Republic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this