TY - JOUR
T1 - Home buprenorphine/naloxone induction in primary care
AU - Lee, Joshua D.
AU - Grossman, Ellie
AU - Dirocco, Danae
AU - Gourevitch, Marc N.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Drs. Andrew B. Wallach and Valerie D. Perel and the staff of the Bellevue Adult Primary Care Clinic, and Drs. Stephen Ross, John Rotrosen, Sapana Shah and Andrea Truncali for their advice and support. Funding: This study was supported in part by a grant from the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation.
Funding Information:
Conflict of Interest: None disclosed. Drs. Lee and Gourevitch receive research funding from Cephalon, Inc., and Alkermes, Inc., to support studies of alcohol treatment.
PY - 2009/2
Y1 - 2009/2
N2 - Buprenorphine can be used for the treatment of opioid dependence in primary care settings. National guidelines recommend directly observed initial dosing followed by multiple in-clinic visits during the induction week. We offered buprenorphine treatment at a public hospital primary care clinic using a home, unobserved induction protocol. Participants were opioid-dependent adults eligible for office-based buprenorphine treatment. The initial physician visit included assessment, education, induction telephone support instructions, an illustrated home induction pamphlet, and a 1-week buprenorphine/naloxone prescription. Patients initiated dosing off-site at a later time. Follow-up with urine toxicology testing occurred at day 7 and thereafter at varying intervals. Primary outcomes were treatment status at week 1 and induction-related events: severe precipitated withdrawal, other buprenorphine-prompted withdrawal symptoms, prolonged unrelieved withdrawal, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Patients (N∈=∈103) were predominantly heroin users (68%), but also prescription opioid misusers (18%) and methadone maintenance patients (14%). At the end of week 1, 73% were retained, 17% provided induction data but did not return to the clinic, and 11% were lost to follow-up with no induction data available. No cases of severe precipitated withdrawal and no SAEs were observed. Five cases (5%) of mild-to-moderate buprenorphine-prompted withdrawal and eight cases of prolonged unrelieved withdrawal symptoms (8% overall, 21% of methadone-to-buprenorphine inductions) were reported. Buprenorphine-prompted withdrawal and prolonged unrelieved withdrawal symptoms were not associated with treatment status at week 1. Home buprenorphine induction was feasible and appeared safe. Induction complications occurred at expected rates and were not associated with short-term treatment drop-out.
AB - Buprenorphine can be used for the treatment of opioid dependence in primary care settings. National guidelines recommend directly observed initial dosing followed by multiple in-clinic visits during the induction week. We offered buprenorphine treatment at a public hospital primary care clinic using a home, unobserved induction protocol. Participants were opioid-dependent adults eligible for office-based buprenorphine treatment. The initial physician visit included assessment, education, induction telephone support instructions, an illustrated home induction pamphlet, and a 1-week buprenorphine/naloxone prescription. Patients initiated dosing off-site at a later time. Follow-up with urine toxicology testing occurred at day 7 and thereafter at varying intervals. Primary outcomes were treatment status at week 1 and induction-related events: severe precipitated withdrawal, other buprenorphine-prompted withdrawal symptoms, prolonged unrelieved withdrawal, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Patients (N∈=∈103) were predominantly heroin users (68%), but also prescription opioid misusers (18%) and methadone maintenance patients (14%). At the end of week 1, 73% were retained, 17% provided induction data but did not return to the clinic, and 11% were lost to follow-up with no induction data available. No cases of severe precipitated withdrawal and no SAEs were observed. Five cases (5%) of mild-to-moderate buprenorphine-prompted withdrawal and eight cases of prolonged unrelieved withdrawal symptoms (8% overall, 21% of methadone-to-buprenorphine inductions) were reported. Buprenorphine-prompted withdrawal and prolonged unrelieved withdrawal symptoms were not associated with treatment status at week 1. Home buprenorphine induction was feasible and appeared safe. Induction complications occurred at expected rates and were not associated with short-term treatment drop-out.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58649094651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58649094651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-008-0866-8
DO - 10.1007/s11606-008-0866-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 19089508
AN - SCOPUS:58649094651
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 24
SP - 226
EP - 232
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
IS - 2
ER -