TY - JOUR
T1 - Home hazards and falls in the elderly
T2 - The role of health and functional status
AU - Northridge, Mary
AU - Nevitt, M. C.
AU - Kelsey, J. L.
AU - Link, B.
PY - 1995
Y1 - 1995
N2 - Objectives. This study was undertaken to determine whether vigorous and frail older people who identify environmental hazards in their homes have an increased risk for falls. Methods. A 1-year prospective study was conducted among 266 female and 59 male community-dwelling volunteers aged 60 to 93 years who had fallen at least once during the previous year. Composite measures of home safety and of frailty were derived using principal components analysis. Participants were divided into vigorous and frail groups, and associations between baseline home safety measures and falls at home over the follow-up year were compared between the two groups. Results. Frail individuals were more than twice as likely as vigorous individuals to fall during follow-up (rate ratio [RR] = 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.54, 3.27). In the study group as a whole, falls were not strongly associated with the presence of home hazards. However, when compared with vigorous older persons living with fewer home hazards, vigorous older persons living with more home hazards were more likely to fall. The increased risk for falls among vigorous elderly was limited to falls where home hazards were present. By contrast, living with more home hazards was not associated with increased likelihood of falls among frail older persons. Conclusions. While frail older persons experience higher overall fall rates, vigorous older persons should not be overlooked in fall prevention projects.
AB - Objectives. This study was undertaken to determine whether vigorous and frail older people who identify environmental hazards in their homes have an increased risk for falls. Methods. A 1-year prospective study was conducted among 266 female and 59 male community-dwelling volunteers aged 60 to 93 years who had fallen at least once during the previous year. Composite measures of home safety and of frailty were derived using principal components analysis. Participants were divided into vigorous and frail groups, and associations between baseline home safety measures and falls at home over the follow-up year were compared between the two groups. Results. Frail individuals were more than twice as likely as vigorous individuals to fall during follow-up (rate ratio [RR] = 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.54, 3.27). In the study group as a whole, falls were not strongly associated with the presence of home hazards. However, when compared with vigorous older persons living with fewer home hazards, vigorous older persons living with more home hazards were more likely to fall. The increased risk for falls among vigorous elderly was limited to falls where home hazards were present. By contrast, living with more home hazards was not associated with increased likelihood of falls among frail older persons. Conclusions. While frail older persons experience higher overall fall rates, vigorous older persons should not be overlooked in fall prevention projects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028962417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028962417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.85.4.509
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.85.4.509
M3 - Article
C2 - 7702114
AN - SCOPUS:0028962417
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 85
SP - 509
EP - 515
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 4
ER -