How generic language shapes the development of social thought

Marjorie Rhodes, Susan A. Gelman, Sarah Jane Leslie

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Generic language, that is, language that refers to a category as an abstract whole (e.g., ‘Girls like pink’) rather than specific individuals (e.g., ‘This girl likes pink’), is a common means by which children learn about social kinds. Here, we propose that children interpret generics as signaling that their referenced categories are natural, objective, and have distinctive features, and, thus, in the social domain, that such language affects children's beliefs about the social world in ways that extend far beyond the content they explicitly communicate. On this account, even generics expressing uncontentious content (e.g., ‘Girls are great at math’) can lead children to think of categories as defining fundamentally distinct kinds of people and contribute to the development of stereotypes and other problematic social phenomena.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)122-132
Number of pages11
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Generic language
  • conceptual development
  • psychological essentialism
  • social cognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How generic language shapes the development of social thought'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this