TY - JOUR
T1 - How teachers form educational expectations for students
T2 - A comparative factorial survey experiment in three institutional contexts
AU - Geven, Sara
AU - Wiborg, Øyvind N.
AU - Fish, Rachel E.
AU - van de Werfhorst, Herman G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - While schools are thought to use meritocratic criteria when evaluating students, research indicates that teachers hold lower expectations for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. However, it is unclear what the unique impact is of specific student traits on teacher expectations, as different traits are often correlated to one another in real life. Moreover, research has neglected the role of the institutional context, yet tracking procedures, financial barriers to education, and institutionalized cultural beliefs may influence how teachers form expectations. We conducted a factorial survey experiment in three contexts that vary with respect to these institutional characteristics (The United States, New York City; Norway, Oslo; the Netherlands, Amsterdam). We asked elementary school teachers to express expectations for hypothetical students whose characteristics were experimentally manipulated. Teachers in the different contexts used the same student traits when forming expectations, yet varied in the importance they attached to these traits. In Amsterdam – where teachers track students on the basis of their performance and tracking bears significant consequences for educational careers – we found a large impact of student performance. In Oslo – where institutions show an explicit commitment to equality of educational opportunity – teachers based their expectations less on student effort, and seemed to make more inferences about student performance by a student's socio-economic background. New York teachers seemed to make few inferences about student performance based on their socio-economic background.
AB - While schools are thought to use meritocratic criteria when evaluating students, research indicates that teachers hold lower expectations for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. However, it is unclear what the unique impact is of specific student traits on teacher expectations, as different traits are often correlated to one another in real life. Moreover, research has neglected the role of the institutional context, yet tracking procedures, financial barriers to education, and institutionalized cultural beliefs may influence how teachers form expectations. We conducted a factorial survey experiment in three contexts that vary with respect to these institutional characteristics (The United States, New York City; Norway, Oslo; the Netherlands, Amsterdam). We asked elementary school teachers to express expectations for hypothetical students whose characteristics were experimentally manipulated. Teachers in the different contexts used the same student traits when forming expectations, yet varied in the importance they attached to these traits. In Amsterdam – where teachers track students on the basis of their performance and tracking bears significant consequences for educational careers – we found a large impact of student performance. In Oslo – where institutions show an explicit commitment to equality of educational opportunity – teachers based their expectations less on student effort, and seemed to make more inferences about student performance by a student's socio-economic background. New York teachers seemed to make few inferences about student performance based on their socio-economic background.
KW - Ability tracking
KW - Educational institutions
KW - Evaluative processes
KW - Factorial survey experiment
KW - Teacher expectations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116333355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116333355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102599
DO - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102599
M3 - Article
C2 - 34627552
AN - SCOPUS:85116333355
SN - 0049-089X
VL - 100
JO - Social Science Research
JF - Social Science Research
M1 - 102599
ER -