TY - JOUR
T1 - Human Rights Beyond the Colonial Imagination
T2 - Legal Empowerment and Techniques of Delegitimation
AU - Ilyés, Emese
AU - Chiponda, Melania
AU - Dhital, Sukti
AU - Satterthwaite, Meg
AU - Badkur, Aakanksha
AU - Gutierrez, Antonio
AU - Carson, Bethany
AU - Mustafa, Dyari
AU - Mesel, Felipe
AU - Feruglio, Francesca
AU - Mushin, Noor
AU - Chitalkar, Poorvi
AU - Sen, Shreya
AU - Kakuru, Tim
AU - Weerachat, Tom
AU - Walton, Tyler
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/7/1
Y1 - 2023/7/1
N2 - Community-based and participatory methods are often marginalized within institutions of power. In this article, we—a group of community advocates, lawyers, scholars, and researchers from across the globe including Thailand, India, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Italy, Iraq, Argentina, the UK, Puerto Rico, and the United States—have collectively gathered ways that community based, participatory legal empowerment research has been delegitimized across these contexts, and offer practical strategies to break out of this white supremacist colonial imagination and interrupt and respond to these instances of silencing and erasure. Our gatherings enable us to bring to life the rich particulars of each of our unique contexts and through this richness begin to see how larger dynamics span the globe. The micro illuminates the mechanics of the macro. This critical analysis that is possible in such a participatory space allowed us to identify these strategies of delegitimation that we were experiencing despite our very different positionalities and histories. These techniques of delegitimation fall into three broad themes: using traditional research as defence, attacking the credibility of communities including denying their humanity, and acts of self-invalidation. These techniques, whether enacted by donors, companies, government agencies, or academic institutions, seek to disempower the lived experiences of community members involved in legal empowerment. By cataloguing these experiences we hope to better understand techniques of silencing and oppression, and to trace the ways that systems of power reinforce their standing through these immediate and interpersonal responses to the voice of the collective.
AB - Community-based and participatory methods are often marginalized within institutions of power. In this article, we—a group of community advocates, lawyers, scholars, and researchers from across the globe including Thailand, India, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Italy, Iraq, Argentina, the UK, Puerto Rico, and the United States—have collectively gathered ways that community based, participatory legal empowerment research has been delegitimized across these contexts, and offer practical strategies to break out of this white supremacist colonial imagination and interrupt and respond to these instances of silencing and erasure. Our gatherings enable us to bring to life the rich particulars of each of our unique contexts and through this richness begin to see how larger dynamics span the globe. The micro illuminates the mechanics of the macro. This critical analysis that is possible in such a participatory space allowed us to identify these strategies of delegitimation that we were experiencing despite our very different positionalities and histories. These techniques of delegitimation fall into three broad themes: using traditional research as defence, attacking the credibility of communities including denying their humanity, and acts of self-invalidation. These techniques, whether enacted by donors, companies, government agencies, or academic institutions, seek to disempower the lived experiences of community members involved in legal empowerment. By cataloguing these experiences we hope to better understand techniques of silencing and oppression, and to trace the ways that systems of power reinforce their standing through these immediate and interpersonal responses to the voice of the collective.
KW - critical psychology
KW - decolonization
KW - liberatory methodologies
KW - participatory action research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169318696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85169318696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jhuman/huad012
DO - 10.1093/jhuman/huad012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85169318696
SN - 1757-9619
VL - 15
SP - 432
EP - 448
JO - Journal of Human Rights Practice
JF - Journal of Human Rights Practice
IS - 2
ER -