TY - JOUR
T1 - Human Screams Occupy a Privileged Niche in the Communication Soundscape
AU - Arnal, Luc H.
AU - Flinker, Adeen
AU - Kleinschmidt, Andreas
AU - Giraud, Anne Lise
AU - Poeppel, David
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Jan Manent for useful discussions; Jess Rowland, Tobias Overath, Jean M. Zarate, Mariane Haddad, and Josh Barocas for technical assistance; and Gregory Hickok, Shihab A. Shamma, Gregory B. Cogan, Nai Ding, and Keith B. Doelling for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported in part by the Fondation Fyssen and the Philippe Foundation (L.H.A.), the Fondation Louis Jeantet (L.H.A. and A.K.), 1F32DC011985 (A.F.), and 2R01DC05660 (D.P.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2015/8/3
Y1 - 2015/8/3
N2 - Screaming is arguably one of the most relevant communication signals for survival in humans. Despite their practical relevance and their theoretical significance as innate [1] and virtually universal [2, 3] vocalizations, what makes screams a unique signal and how they are processed is not known. Here, we use acoustic analyses, psychophysical experiments, and neuroimaging to isolate those features that confer to screams their alarming nature, and we track their processing in the human brain. Using the modulation power spectrum (MPS [4, 5]), a recently developed, neurally informed characterization of sounds, we demonstrate that human screams cluster within restricted portion of the acoustic space (between ∼30 and 150 Hz modulation rates) that corresponds to a well-known perceptual attribute, roughness. In contrast to the received view that roughness is irrelevant for communication [6], our data reveal that the acoustic space occupied by the rough vocal regime is segregated from other signals, including speech, a pre-requisite to avoid false alarms in normal vocal communication. We show that roughness is present in natural alarm signals as well as in artificial alarms and that the presence of roughness in sounds boosts their detection in various tasks. Using fMRI, we show that acoustic roughness engages subcortical structures critical to rapidly appraise danger. Altogether, these data demonstrate that screams occupy a privileged acoustic niche that, being separated from other communication signals, ensures their biological and ultimately social efficiency.
AB - Screaming is arguably one of the most relevant communication signals for survival in humans. Despite their practical relevance and their theoretical significance as innate [1] and virtually universal [2, 3] vocalizations, what makes screams a unique signal and how they are processed is not known. Here, we use acoustic analyses, psychophysical experiments, and neuroimaging to isolate those features that confer to screams their alarming nature, and we track their processing in the human brain. Using the modulation power spectrum (MPS [4, 5]), a recently developed, neurally informed characterization of sounds, we demonstrate that human screams cluster within restricted portion of the acoustic space (between ∼30 and 150 Hz modulation rates) that corresponds to a well-known perceptual attribute, roughness. In contrast to the received view that roughness is irrelevant for communication [6], our data reveal that the acoustic space occupied by the rough vocal regime is segregated from other signals, including speech, a pre-requisite to avoid false alarms in normal vocal communication. We show that roughness is present in natural alarm signals as well as in artificial alarms and that the presence of roughness in sounds boosts their detection in various tasks. Using fMRI, we show that acoustic roughness engages subcortical structures critical to rapidly appraise danger. Altogether, these data demonstrate that screams occupy a privileged acoustic niche that, being separated from other communication signals, ensures their biological and ultimately social efficiency.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938748643&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938748643&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.043
DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.043
M3 - Article
C2 - 26190070
AN - SCOPUS:84938748643
SN - 0960-9822
VL - 25
SP - 2051
EP - 2056
JO - Current Biology
JF - Current Biology
IS - 15
ER -