TY - GEN
T1 - I Tag, You Tag, Everybody Tags!
AU - Ibrahim, Hazem
AU - Asim, Rohail
AU - Varvello, Matteo
AU - Zaki, Yasir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 ACM.
PY - 2023/10/24
Y1 - 2023/10/24
N2 - Location tags are designed to track personal belongings. Nevertheless, there has been anecdotal evidence that location tags are also misused to stalk people. Tracking is achieved locally, e.g., via Bluetooth with a paired phone, and remotely, by piggybacking on location-reporting devices which come into proximity of a tag. This paper studies the performance of the two most popular location tags (Apple's AirTag and Samsung's SmartTag) through controlled experiments - with a known large distribution of location-reporting devices - as well as in-the-wild experiments - with no control on the number and kind of reporting devices encountered, thus emulating real-life use-cases. We find that both tags achieve similar performance, e.g., they are located 55% of the times in about 10 minutes within a 100∼m radius. It follows that real time stalking to a precise location via location tags is impractical, even when both tags are concurrently deployed which achieves comparable accuracy in half the time. Nevertheless, half of a victim's exact movements can be backtracked accurately (10m error) with just a one-hour delay, which is still perilous information in the possession of a stalker.
AB - Location tags are designed to track personal belongings. Nevertheless, there has been anecdotal evidence that location tags are also misused to stalk people. Tracking is achieved locally, e.g., via Bluetooth with a paired phone, and remotely, by piggybacking on location-reporting devices which come into proximity of a tag. This paper studies the performance of the two most popular location tags (Apple's AirTag and Samsung's SmartTag) through controlled experiments - with a known large distribution of location-reporting devices - as well as in-the-wild experiments - with no control on the number and kind of reporting devices encountered, thus emulating real-life use-cases. We find that both tags achieve similar performance, e.g., they are located 55% of the times in about 10 minutes within a 100∼m radius. It follows that real time stalking to a precise location via location tags is impractical, even when both tags are concurrently deployed which achieves comparable accuracy in half the time. Nevertheless, half of a victim's exact movements can be backtracked accurately (10m error) with just a one-hour delay, which is still perilous information in the possession of a stalker.
KW - location tags
KW - privacy
KW - tracking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177618814&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177618814&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3618257.3624834
DO - 10.1145/3618257.3624834
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85177618814
T3 - Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference, IMC
SP - 561
EP - 568
BT - IMC 2023 - Proceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - 23rd Edition of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference, IMC 2023
Y2 - 24 October 2023 through 26 October 2023
ER -