Identification and remediation of phonological and motor errors in acquired sound production impairment

Adam Buchwald, Bernadine Gagnon, Michele Miozzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to test whether an approach to distinguishing errors arising in phonological processing from those arising in motor planning also predicts the extent to which repetition-based training can lead to improved production of difficult sound sequences. Method: Four individuals with acquired speech production impairment who produced consonant cluster errors involving deletion were examined using a repetition task. We compared the acoustic details of productions with deletion errors in target consonant clusters to singleton consonants. Changes in accuracy over the course of the study were also compared. Results: Two individuals produced deletion errors consistent with a phonological locus of the errors, and 2 individuals produced errors consistent with a motoric locus of the errors. The 2 individuals who made phonologically driven errors showed no change in performance on a repetition training task, whereas the 2 individuals with motoric errors improved in their production of both trained and untrained items. Conclusions: The results extend previous findings about a metric for identifying the source of sound production errors in individuals with both apraxia of speech and aphasia. In particular, this work may provide a tool for identifying predominant error types in individuals with complex deficits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1726-1738
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume60
Issue number6Special Issue
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identification and remediation of phonological and motor errors in acquired sound production impairment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this