TY - JOUR
T1 - Ideology
T2 - Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology
AU - Jost, John T.
AU - Nosek, Brian A.
AU - Gosling, Samuel D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Preparation of this article was supported in part by a grant from the NYU Center for Catastrophe Preparedness and Response, by National Science Foundation Grant #BCS-0617558 to John T. Jost, and by National Institute of Health Grant R-01 MH068447 to Brian A. Nosek. We thank Radhika Dhariwal, Cara Jolly, Jaime Napier, and Kate Niederhoffer for research-related assistance and Ed Diener, Irina Feygina, Jack Glaser, Sylviane Houssais, Orsolya Hunyady, Masumi Iida, Alison Ledgerwood, Ido Liviatan, Anesu Mandisodza, Tali Mentovich, Jamie Napier, Polina Potanina, Constantine Sedikides, Hulda Thorisdottir, and Jojanneke van der Toorn for helpful comments on previous drafts. Portions of this research were presented at Princeton University, Duke University, Ohio State University, the 2006 meeting of the Society for Personal and Social Psychology in Palm Springs, CA, and the 2007 meeting of the Association for Psychological Science in Washington, DC, where we received valuable feedback.
PY - 2008/3
Y1 - 2008/3
N2 - We trace the rise, fall, and resurgence of political ideology as a topic of research in social, personality, and political psychology. For over 200 years, political belief systems have been classified usefully according to a single left—right (or liberal-conservative) dimension that, we believe, possesses two core aspects: (a) advocating versus resisting social change and (b) rejecting versus accepting inequality. There have been many skeptics of the notion that most people are ideologically inclined, but recent psychological evidence suggests that left-right differences are pronounced in many life domains. Implicit as well as explicit preferences for tradition, conformity, order, stability, traditional values, and hierarchy—versus those for progress, rebelliousness, chaos, flexibility, feminism, and equality—are associated with conservatism and liberalism, respectively. Conservatives score consistently higher than liberals on measures of system justification. Furthermore, there are personality and lifestyle differences between liberals and conservatives as well as situational variables that induce either liberal or conservative shifts in political opinions. Our thesis is that ideological belief systems may be structured according to a left-right dimension for largely psychological reasons linked to variability in the needs to reduce uncertainty and threat.
AB - We trace the rise, fall, and resurgence of political ideology as a topic of research in social, personality, and political psychology. For over 200 years, political belief systems have been classified usefully according to a single left—right (or liberal-conservative) dimension that, we believe, possesses two core aspects: (a) advocating versus resisting social change and (b) rejecting versus accepting inequality. There have been many skeptics of the notion that most people are ideologically inclined, but recent psychological evidence suggests that left-right differences are pronounced in many life domains. Implicit as well as explicit preferences for tradition, conformity, order, stability, traditional values, and hierarchy—versus those for progress, rebelliousness, chaos, flexibility, feminism, and equality—are associated with conservatism and liberalism, respectively. Conservatives score consistently higher than liberals on measures of system justification. Furthermore, there are personality and lifestyle differences between liberals and conservatives as well as situational variables that induce either liberal or conservative shifts in political opinions. Our thesis is that ideological belief systems may be structured according to a left-right dimension for largely psychological reasons linked to variability in the needs to reduce uncertainty and threat.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993781874&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993781874&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84993781874
SN - 1745-6916
VL - 3
SP - 126
EP - 136
JO - Perspectives on Psychological Science
JF - Perspectives on Psychological Science
IS - 2
ER -