TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation of non-insulin-dependent diabetes self-management education (DSME) in LMICs
T2 - a systematic review of cost, adoption, acceptability, and fidelity in resource-constrained settings
AU - Fitzpatrick, Reilly
AU - Pant, Shubhra
AU - Li, Jamie
AU - Ritterman, Rebecca
AU - Adenikinju, Deborah
AU - Iloegbu, Chukwuemeka
AU - Pateña, John
AU - Vieira, Dorice
AU - Gyamfi, Joyce
AU - Peprah, Emmanuel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
2023 Fitzpatrick, Pant, Li, Ritterman, Adenikinju, Iloegbu, Pateña, Viera, Gyamfi and Peprah.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Type II diabetes (T2D), is a serious health issue accounting for 10.7% of mortality globally. 80% of cases worldwide are found in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), with rapidly increasing prevalence. Diabetes-self management education (DSME) is a cost-effective program that provides at-risk individuals with the knowledge and skills they need to adopt lifestyle changes that will improve their health and well-being. This systematic review examined the application of DSME in LMICs and identified the corresponding implementation results (cost, fidelity, acceptance, and adoption) associated with successful implementation in low-resource settings. Methods and analysis: The available research on T2D and the use of DSME in LMIC were systematically searched for using six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PAIS, and EBSCO Discovery) between the months of October and November of 2022. The articles that met the search criteria were subsequently imported into EndNote and Covidence for analysis. The Cochrane RoB methodology for randomized trials was used to evaluate the risk of bias (RoB) in the included studies. A narrative synthesis was used to summarize the results. Results: A total of 773 studies were imported for screening, after 203 duplicates were removed, 570 remained. Abstract and title screenings resulted in the exclusion of 487 articles, leaving 83 for full-text review. Following a full-text review, 76 articles were excluded and seven were found to be relevant to our search. The most common reasons for exclusion were study design (n = 23), lack of results (n = 14), and wrong patient population (n = 12). Conclusion: Our systemic review found that DSME can be an acceptable and cost-effective solution in LMIC. While we intended to analyze cost, adoption, acceptability, and fidelity, our investigation revealed a gap in the literature on those areas, with most studies focusing on acceptability and cost and no studies identifying fidelity or adoption. To further evaluate the efficacy of DSME and enhance health outcomes for T2D in LMICs, more research is needed on its application. Systematic Review Registration: osf.io/7482t.
AB - Background: Type II diabetes (T2D), is a serious health issue accounting for 10.7% of mortality globally. 80% of cases worldwide are found in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), with rapidly increasing prevalence. Diabetes-self management education (DSME) is a cost-effective program that provides at-risk individuals with the knowledge and skills they need to adopt lifestyle changes that will improve their health and well-being. This systematic review examined the application of DSME in LMICs and identified the corresponding implementation results (cost, fidelity, acceptance, and adoption) associated with successful implementation in low-resource settings. Methods and analysis: The available research on T2D and the use of DSME in LMIC were systematically searched for using six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PAIS, and EBSCO Discovery) between the months of October and November of 2022. The articles that met the search criteria were subsequently imported into EndNote and Covidence for analysis. The Cochrane RoB methodology for randomized trials was used to evaluate the risk of bias (RoB) in the included studies. A narrative synthesis was used to summarize the results. Results: A total of 773 studies were imported for screening, after 203 duplicates were removed, 570 remained. Abstract and title screenings resulted in the exclusion of 487 articles, leaving 83 for full-text review. Following a full-text review, 76 articles were excluded and seven were found to be relevant to our search. The most common reasons for exclusion were study design (n = 23), lack of results (n = 14), and wrong patient population (n = 12). Conclusion: Our systemic review found that DSME can be an acceptable and cost-effective solution in LMIC. While we intended to analyze cost, adoption, acceptability, and fidelity, our investigation revealed a gap in the literature on those areas, with most studies focusing on acceptability and cost and no studies identifying fidelity or adoption. To further evaluate the efficacy of DSME and enhance health outcomes for T2D in LMICs, more research is needed on its application. Systematic Review Registration: osf.io/7482t.
KW - acceptability
KW - adoption
KW - cost
KW - DSME
KW - fidelity
KW - implementation outcomes
KW - LMIC
KW - T2D
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183842664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85183842664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/frhs.2023.1155911
DO - 10.3389/frhs.2023.1155911
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85183842664
SN - 2813-0146
VL - 3
JO - Frontiers in Health Services
JF - Frontiers in Health Services
M1 - 1155911
ER -