TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation outcomes and strategies for delivering evidence-based hypertension interventions in lower-middle-income countries
T2 - Evidence from a multi-country consortium for hypertension control
AU - Gyamfi, Joyce
AU - Iwelunmor, Juliet
AU - Patel, Shivani
AU - Irazola, Vilma
AU - Aifah, Angela
AU - Rakhra, Ashlin
AU - Butler, Mark
AU - Vedanthan, Rajesh
AU - Hoang, Giang Nguyen
AU - Nyambura, Monicah
AU - Nguyen, Hoa
AU - Nguyen, Cuc
AU - Asante, Kwaku Poku
AU - Nyame, Solomon
AU - Adjei, Kwame
AU - Amoah, John
AU - Apusiga, Kingsley
AU - Adjei, Kezia Gladys Amaning
AU - Ramierz-Zea, Manuel
AU - Hernandez, Diego
AU - Fort, Meredith
AU - Sharma, Hanspria
AU - Jarhyan, Prashant
AU - Peprah, Emmanuel
AU - Ogedegbe, Gbenga
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Gyamfi et al.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Guidance on contextually tailored implementation strategies for the prevention, treatment, and control of hypertension is limited in lower-middle income countries (Lower-MIC). To address this limitation, we compiled implementation strategies and accompanying outcomes of evidence-based hypertension interventions currently being implemented in five Lower-MIC. The Global Research on Implementation and Translation Science (GRIT) Coordinating Center (CC) (GRIT-CC) engaged its global network sites at Ghana, Guatemala, India, Kenya, and Vietnam. Purposively sampled implementation science experts completed an electronic survey assessing implementation outcomes, in addition to implementation strategies used in their ongoing hypertension interventions from among 73 strategies within the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC). Experts rated the strategies based on highest priority to their interventions. We analyzed the data by sorting implementation strategies utilized by sites into one of the nine domains in ERIC and summarized the data using frequencies, proportions, and means. Seventeen implementation experts (52.9% men) participated in the exercise. Of Proctor's implementation outcomes identified across sites, all outcomes except for appropriateness were broadly assessed by three or more countries. Overall, 59 out of 73 (81%) strategies were being utilized in the five countries. The highest priority implementation strategies utilized across all five countries focused on evaluative and iterative strategies (e.g., identification of context specific barriers and facilitators) to delivery of patient- and community-level interventions, while the lowest priority was use of financial and infrastructure change strategies. More capacity building strategies (developing stakeholder interrelationships, training and educating stakeholders, and supporting clinicians) were incorporated into interventions implemented in India and Vietnam than Ghana, Kenya, and Guatemala. Although robust implementation strategies are being used in Lower -MICs, there is minimum use of financial and infrastructure change strategies. Our study contributes to the growing literature that demonstrates the use of Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) implementation strategies to deliver evidence-based hypertension interventions in Lower-MICs and will inform future cross-country data harmonization activities in resource-constrained settings.
AB - Guidance on contextually tailored implementation strategies for the prevention, treatment, and control of hypertension is limited in lower-middle income countries (Lower-MIC). To address this limitation, we compiled implementation strategies and accompanying outcomes of evidence-based hypertension interventions currently being implemented in five Lower-MIC. The Global Research on Implementation and Translation Science (GRIT) Coordinating Center (CC) (GRIT-CC) engaged its global network sites at Ghana, Guatemala, India, Kenya, and Vietnam. Purposively sampled implementation science experts completed an electronic survey assessing implementation outcomes, in addition to implementation strategies used in their ongoing hypertension interventions from among 73 strategies within the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC). Experts rated the strategies based on highest priority to their interventions. We analyzed the data by sorting implementation strategies utilized by sites into one of the nine domains in ERIC and summarized the data using frequencies, proportions, and means. Seventeen implementation experts (52.9% men) participated in the exercise. Of Proctor's implementation outcomes identified across sites, all outcomes except for appropriateness were broadly assessed by three or more countries. Overall, 59 out of 73 (81%) strategies were being utilized in the five countries. The highest priority implementation strategies utilized across all five countries focused on evaluative and iterative strategies (e.g., identification of context specific barriers and facilitators) to delivery of patient- and community-level interventions, while the lowest priority was use of financial and infrastructure change strategies. More capacity building strategies (developing stakeholder interrelationships, training and educating stakeholders, and supporting clinicians) were incorporated into interventions implemented in India and Vietnam than Ghana, Kenya, and Guatemala. Although robust implementation strategies are being used in Lower -MICs, there is minimum use of financial and infrastructure change strategies. Our study contributes to the growing literature that demonstrates the use of Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) implementation strategies to deliver evidence-based hypertension interventions in Lower-MICs and will inform future cross-country data harmonization activities in resource-constrained settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160408272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85160408272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0286204
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0286204
M3 - Article
C2 - 37228144
AN - SCOPUS:85160408272
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 18
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 5 May
M1 - e0286204
ER -